Toward the application of a machine learning framework for building life cycle energy assessment

被引:9
|
作者
Venkatraj, V. [1 ,4 ]
Dixit, M. K. [1 ]
Yan, W. [2 ]
Caffey, S. [2 ]
Sideris, P. [3 ]
Aryal, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] 38880 Guardino Dr, Fremont, CA 94536 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life cycle energy; Embodied energy; Operating energy; Machine learning; Supervised learning; Building life cycle energy assessment; Building load prediction; Building performance analysis; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; EMBODIED ENERGY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; PREDICTION METHOD; COOLING LOADS; CONSUMPTION; DESIGN; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113444
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry in the United States consumes more than 50% of the global energy supply per year, suggesting that significant efforts may be needed to reduce building energy demand and its carbon footprint. During their lifespans, buildings consume embodied energy (EE) and operational energy (OE). Building professionals, therefore, conduct life cycle energy assessments (LCEA) to quantify and understand the paradox and interconnectedness between EE and OE. Traditionally, simulation-based optimization techniques were used for design space exploration to identify a building design with the fewest energy implications. However, literature shows these data-driven approaches are often error-prone, time-consuming, and computationally expensive, and they fail to provide real-time feedback to the user. Moreover, EE and OE assessment tools are disjointed and suffer from interoperability issues. These limitations restrict design space exploration, which eventually hinders the design decision-making process. Over the last few years, the increased availability of building data has made machine learning (ML) techniques a popular choice for building performance assessments. Several articles have developed prediction models to assess or optimize OE. While this work is significant, studies utilizing ML techniques for building LCEA are lacking, mainly due to the unavailability of a large-scale LCEA database. In this paper, we propose a methodology to (1) generate a simulation-based building energy dataset for different building typologies using a parametric framework, (2) utilize the synthetically generated database to develop an ML-based prediction model to predict EE and OE, and (3) test the model using a case study. The case study results show that the model achieves high prediction performance using minimal inputs available during the early design phase. The results further indicate that ML techniques can be used by building designers with no or limited LCE expertise to instantaneously estimate building LCE performance and help them select design options with minimal LCE consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand
    Kofoworola, Oyeshola F.
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (10) : 1076 - 1083
  • [22] Energy efficient retrofit and life cycle assessment of an apartment building
    Kmet'kova, Jana
    Krajcik, Michal
    6TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PHYSICS CONFERENCE (IBPC 2015), 2015, 78 : 3186 - 3191
  • [23] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in Building Energy Retrofitting; A Review
    Toosi, Hashem Amini
    Lavagna, Monica
    Leonforte, Fabrizio
    Del Pero, Claudio
    Aste, Niccolo
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 60 (60)
  • [24] Integration of Building Simulation and Life Cycle Assessment: A TRNSYS Application
    Guarino, Francesco
    Cellura, Maurizio
    Longo, Sonia
    Gulotta, Teresa
    Mistretta, Marina
    Tumminia, Giovanni
    Ferraro, Marco
    Antonucci, Vincenzo
    71ST CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION (ATI 2016), 2016, 101 : 360 - 367
  • [25] A framework for building overhang design using Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment
    Panteli, Christiana
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Stasiuliene, Laura
    Seduikyte, Lina
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 20 : 248 - 255
  • [26] Quantitative life-cycle assessment framework for environmental impact of building
    Li, XD
    Zhang, ZH
    Yang, XM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 2555 - 2559
  • [27] A cross-platform modular framework for building Life Cycle Assessment
    Kiss, B.
    Roeck, M.
    Passer, A.
    Szalay, Z.
    SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ), 2019, 323
  • [28] A framework of integrating machine learning model and pavement life cycle assessment to optimize asphalt mixture design
    Xu, Chang
    Chen, Xiao
    Zeng, Qingwei
    Cai, Mingmao
    Zhang, Wenxuan
    Yu, Bin
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2025, 469
  • [29] A framework to understand effect of building systems deterioration on life cycle energy
    Thomas, Albert
    Menassa, Carol C.
    Kamat, Vineet R.
    DEFINING THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE IN DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 118 : 507 - 514
  • [30] Application of life cycle assessment and machine learning for the production and environmental sustainability assessment of hydrothermal bio-oil
    Guo, Genmao
    He, Yuan
    Jin, Fangming
    Masek, Ondrej
    Huang, Qing
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 379