Assessment of the Environmental Performance of Blended Cements from a Life Cycle Perspective: A Systematic Review

被引:22
|
作者
Rhaouti, Yasmine [1 ]
Taha, Yassine [1 ]
Benzaazoua, Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Min Environm & Circular Econ, Lot 660 Hay Moulay Rachid, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Supplementary cementitious materials; Cement; Sustainability; IMPACT DISTRIBUTION METHODS; CALCINED CLAY CEMENT; LCA; INDUSTRY; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) are gradually depicted as the gateway to sustainability for the cement industry. In light of this, life cycle assessments (LCA)s of various blended cements have been conducted to evaluate their environmental impacts. However, these LCAs have yet to be compiled, compared and synthesized to be of use to decision makers and researchers in this field of study.By the means of a systematic review, this article aims to coherently articulate and unify LCAs of blended cements currently available in the literature in order to create a reference for stakeholders and researchers. It also aims to outline the key challenges concerning LCAs of SCM-based cements to guide future research.A total of 32 studies were analysed. From each study, key elements from every step of the LCAs were extracted then compared. The review revealed that 11 types of SCMs were studied with SCM content ranging from 3 % to 85 %. Most of the papers conducted cradle-to-gate LCAs of 1 ton of cement, focusing chiefly on the global warming potential (GWP) indicator and adopting the IPCC method. A statistical comparison of the impact assessment results suggested that limestone calcined clay cement could be the most promising solution to the cement industry, with an average GWP of 517 kgCO2eq/ton of cement and SCM content of 46%, despite the large variability of impact assessment results.However, the limited amount of assessed impact categories, the exclusion of durability and compressive strength from the functional unit and the quasi-absence of uncertainty analyses are major weaknesses of the papers, which may mislead decision-makers. Besides, the lack of available LCAs of blended cements and the wide diversity of impact assessment methods hinder consolidation efforts. These points need to be addressed in future studies so that references can be built for the benefit of stakeholders.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment
    Luigia Petti
    Monica Serreli
    Silvia Di Cesare
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 422 - 431
  • [42] Life cycle assessment of housing and neighbourhoods: A systematic review
    Ruiz-Valero, L.
    Arceo, A.
    Kesik, T.
    Touchie, M.
    O'Brien, W.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 210
  • [43] Life cycle assessment of vehicle tires: A systematic review
    Dong, Yahong
    Zhao, Yating
    Hossain, Md Uzzal
    He, Yan
    Liu, Peng
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 2
  • [44] A review on environmental impacts from aviation sector in terms of life cycle assessment
    Calisir, Duran
    Ekici, Selcuk
    Midilli, Adnan
    Karakoc, Tahir Hikmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2020, 22 (02) : 211 - 234
  • [45] Use of life cycle assessment as a tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of textile effluents: a systematic review
    Aguiar, Gustavo Jose Araujo
    Almeida, Leticia Ramos
    Fernandes, Bruna Soares
    Gavazza, Savia
    Silva, Gilson Lima
    Machado Santos, Simone
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (31) : 76455 - 76470
  • [46] Integration of life cycle assessment and system dynamics modeling for environmental scenario analysis: A systematic review
    Yi, Yanqing
    Wu, Junzhang
    Zuliani, Filippo
    Lavagnolo, Maria Cristina
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 903
  • [47] Type and number of environmental impact categories used in livestock life cycle assessment: A systematic review
    McClellande, S. C.
    Arndt, C.
    Gordon, D. R.
    Thoma, G.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2018, 209 : 39 - 45
  • [48] Waste Transportation Environmental Impact Using Life Cycle Assessment: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wati, Hessy Rahma
    Budihardjo, Mochamad Arief
    Andarani, Pertiwi
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2025, 34 (01): : 563 - 571
  • [49] Environmental evaluation of metals and minerals production based on a life cycle assessment approach: A systematic review
    Rachid, Safa
    Taha, Yassine
    Benzaazoua, Mostafa
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2023, 198
  • [50] Use of life cycle assessment as a tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of textile effluents: a systematic review
    Gustavo José Araújo Aguiar
    Letícia Ramos Almeida
    Bruna Soares Fernandes
    Sávia Gavazza
    Gilson Lima Silva
    Simone Machado Santos
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 76455 - 76470