Assessment of the Environmental Performance of Blended Cements from a Life Cycle Perspective: A Systematic Review

被引:22
|
作者
Rhaouti, Yasmine [1 ]
Taha, Yassine [1 ]
Benzaazoua, Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Min Environm & Circular Econ, Lot 660 Hay Moulay Rachid, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Supplementary cementitious materials; Cement; Sustainability; IMPACT DISTRIBUTION METHODS; CALCINED CLAY CEMENT; LCA; INDUSTRY; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) are gradually depicted as the gateway to sustainability for the cement industry. In light of this, life cycle assessments (LCA)s of various blended cements have been conducted to evaluate their environmental impacts. However, these LCAs have yet to be compiled, compared and synthesized to be of use to decision makers and researchers in this field of study.By the means of a systematic review, this article aims to coherently articulate and unify LCAs of blended cements currently available in the literature in order to create a reference for stakeholders and researchers. It also aims to outline the key challenges concerning LCAs of SCM-based cements to guide future research.A total of 32 studies were analysed. From each study, key elements from every step of the LCAs were extracted then compared. The review revealed that 11 types of SCMs were studied with SCM content ranging from 3 % to 85 %. Most of the papers conducted cradle-to-gate LCAs of 1 ton of cement, focusing chiefly on the global warming potential (GWP) indicator and adopting the IPCC method. A statistical comparison of the impact assessment results suggested that limestone calcined clay cement could be the most promising solution to the cement industry, with an average GWP of 517 kgCO2eq/ton of cement and SCM content of 46%, despite the large variability of impact assessment results.However, the limited amount of assessed impact categories, the exclusion of durability and compressive strength from the functional unit and the quasi-absence of uncertainty analyses are major weaknesses of the papers, which may mislead decision-makers. Besides, the lack of available LCAs of blended cements and the wide diversity of impact assessment methods hinder consolidation efforts. These points need to be addressed in future studies so that references can be built for the benefit of stakeholders.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Material, energy and environmental performance of technological and social systems under a Life Cycle Assessment perspective
    Ulgiati, S.
    Ascione, M.
    Bargigli, S.
    Cherubini, F.
    Franzese, P. P.
    Raugei, M.
    Viglia, S.
    Zucaro, A.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (01) : 176 - 189
  • [32] Environmental Performance of Building Integrated Grey Water Reuse Systems: Life Cycle Assessment Perspective
    Yoonus, Hamad
    Mannan, Mehzabeen
    Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
    WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2020: WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER AND WATER DESALINATION AND REUSE, 2020, : 1 - 7
  • [33] The Extended of the Life Cycle Assessment on Corporate Environmental Performance
    Chen, Xuan
    Chun, Weide
    CONFERENCE ON WEB BASED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-2, 2010, : 104 - +
  • [34] Life cycle assessment as a tool to enhance the environmental performance of carbon nanotube products: a review
    Upadhyayula, Venkata K. K.
    Meyer, David E.
    Curran, Mary Ann
    Gonzalez, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 26 : 37 - 47
  • [35] Identification and assessment of environmental burdens of Chinese copper production from a life cycle perspective
    Xiaolong Song
    Jianxin Yang
    Bin Lu
    Bo Li
    Guangyuan Zeng
    Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 8 : 580 - 588
  • [36] Identification and assessment of environmental burdens of Chinese copper production from a life cycle perspective
    Song, Xiaolong
    Yang, Jianxin
    Lu, Bin
    Li, Bo
    Zeng, Guangyuan
    FRONTIERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2014, 8 (04) : 580 - 588
  • [37] Life cycle sustainability assessment: A systematic literature review through the application perspective, indicators, and methodologies
    Visentin, Caroline
    da Silva Trentin, Adan William
    Braun, Adeli Beatriz
    Thome, Ant Onio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
  • [38] Environmental emissions and energy consumptions assessment of a diesel engine from the life cycle perspective
    Li, Tao
    Liu, Zhi-Chao
    Zhang, Hong-Chao
    Jiang, Qiu-Hong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 53 : 7 - 12
  • [39] Temporal issues in life cycle assessment—a systematic review
    Stefan Lueddeckens
    Peter Saling
    Edeltraud Guenther
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1385 - 1401
  • [40] Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment
    Petti, Luigia
    Serreli, Monica
    Di Cesare, Silvia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03): : 422 - 431