Assessment of the Environmental Performance of Blended Cements from a Life Cycle Perspective: A Systematic Review

被引:22
|
作者
Rhaouti, Yasmine [1 ]
Taha, Yassine [1 ]
Benzaazoua, Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Min Environm & Circular Econ, Lot 660 Hay Moulay Rachid, Ben Guerir 43150, Morocco
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Supplementary cementitious materials; Cement; Sustainability; IMPACT DISTRIBUTION METHODS; CALCINED CLAY CEMENT; LCA; INDUSTRY; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) are gradually depicted as the gateway to sustainability for the cement industry. In light of this, life cycle assessments (LCA)s of various blended cements have been conducted to evaluate their environmental impacts. However, these LCAs have yet to be compiled, compared and synthesized to be of use to decision makers and researchers in this field of study.By the means of a systematic review, this article aims to coherently articulate and unify LCAs of blended cements currently available in the literature in order to create a reference for stakeholders and researchers. It also aims to outline the key challenges concerning LCAs of SCM-based cements to guide future research.A total of 32 studies were analysed. From each study, key elements from every step of the LCAs were extracted then compared. The review revealed that 11 types of SCMs were studied with SCM content ranging from 3 % to 85 %. Most of the papers conducted cradle-to-gate LCAs of 1 ton of cement, focusing chiefly on the global warming potential (GWP) indicator and adopting the IPCC method. A statistical comparison of the impact assessment results suggested that limestone calcined clay cement could be the most promising solution to the cement industry, with an average GWP of 517 kgCO2eq/ton of cement and SCM content of 46%, despite the large variability of impact assessment results.However, the limited amount of assessed impact categories, the exclusion of durability and compressive strength from the functional unit and the quasi-absence of uncertainty analyses are major weaknesses of the papers, which may mislead decision-makers. Besides, the lack of available LCAs of blended cements and the wide diversity of impact assessment methods hinder consolidation efforts. These points need to be addressed in future studies so that references can be built for the benefit of stakeholders.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancing environmental performance in biogas production from wastewater-grown microalgae: A life cycle assessment perspective
    Santurbano, Victor
    Marangon, Bianca
    Castro, Jackeline
    Calijuri, Maria Lucia
    Leme, Marcio
    Assemany, Paula
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 362
  • [22] Life cycle assessment in the petroleum industry: A systematic framework towards improved environmental performance
    Zarkani, Huda Majid Al
    Mezher, Toufic
    El-Fadel, Mutasem
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 408
  • [23] A systematic review of life cycle assessment and environmental footprint for the global coffee value chain
    dos Muchangos, Leticia Sarmento
    Mejia, Cristian
    Gupta, Ranjit
    Sadreghazi, Shuan
    Kajikawa, Yuya
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 111
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of electricity from biogas: A systematic literature review
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    Barros, Murillo Vetroni
    De Paula Do Rosario, Jose Guilherme
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    da Luz, Leila Mendes
    de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 38 (04)
  • [25] Environmental performance of biological nutrient removal processes from a life cycle perspective
    Ontiveros, Guillermo A.
    Campanella, Enrique A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 506 - 512
  • [26] Environmental Performance Measures to Assess Building Refurbishment from a Life Cycle Perspective
    Nydahl, Helena
    Andersson, Staffan
    Astrand, Anders P.
    Olofsson, Thomas
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (02)
  • [27] A review of radioactive waste processing and disposal from a life cycle environmental perspective
    Clayton, Rachael
    Kirk, Joel
    Banford, Anthony
    Stamford, Laurence
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2025, 27 (02) : 665 - 682
  • [28] The Environmental Performance of Traction Batteries for Electric Vehicles from a Life Cycle Perspective
    Sandrini, Giulia
    Co, Beatrice
    Tomasoni, Giuseppe
    Gadola, Marco
    Chindamo, Daniel
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 25 (01) : 700 - 716
  • [29] A review of radioactive waste processing and disposal from a life cycle environmental perspective
    Clayton, Rachael
    Kirk, Joel
    Banford, Anthony
    Stamford, Laurence
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2024,
  • [30] Environmental assessment of Micro/Nano production in a life cycle perspective
    Olsen, Stig Irving
    Jorgensen, Michael Sogaard
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS TOOLS FOR GREEN MATERIALS AND PROCESS SELECTION, 2006, 895 : 159 - +