Manual and semi-automated computed tomography volumetry significantly overestimates the right liver lobe graft weight: a single-center study with adult living liver donors

被引:0
|
作者
Celik, Hakki [1 ]
Odaman, Hueseyin
Altay, Canan [1 ]
Unek, Tarkan [2 ]
Ozbilgin, Muecahit
Egeli, Tufan [2 ]
Agalar, Cihan [2 ]
Astarcioglu, Ibrahim Kemal [2 ]
Barlik, Funda [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Izmir, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Liver; living donor liver transplantation; manual CT volumetry; semi-automated CT volumetry; transplantation; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.4274/dir.2023.221903
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Preoperative evaluation of donor liver volume is indispensable in living donor liver transplantation to ensure sufficient residual liver and graft -to -recipient weight ratio. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of two computed tomography (CT) volumetry programs, an interactive manual and a semi -automated one, in the preoperative estimation of the right lobe graft weight. METHODS One hundred and nine right liver lobe living donors between January 2008 and January 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists measured the liver graft volumes independently using manual and semi -automated CT volumetry, and the interaction time was recorded. Actual graft weight (AGW) measured intraoperatively served as the reference standard. The paired samples t -test was used to compare the estimated graft weight (EGW) and the AGW. Inter -user and inter -method agreements were assessed with Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS Both manual and semi -automated CT volumetry significantly overestimated the graft weight (EGW manual: 893 +/- 155 mL vs. AGW manual: 787 +/- 128 g, P < 0.001, EGW semi -automated: 879 +/- 143 mL vs. AGW semi -automated, P < 0.001). The junior radiologist measured higher volumes than the senior radiologist with either method (P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed mean difference and standard deviation for inter -method agreement of 7 +/- 48 cc for the senior radiologist, and 34 +/- 54 cc for the junior radiologist. The mean difference and standard deviation for inter -method agreement was 63 +/- 59 cc in manual volumetry and 22 +/- 38 cc in semi -automated volumetry. The mean interaction time was 27.3 +/- 14.2 min for manual volumetry and 6.8 +/- 1.4 min for semi -automated volumetry (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Both manual and semi -automated CT volumetry significantly overestimated the right liver graft weight, while semi -automated volumetry significantly reduced the interaction time.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Invited commentary on: Venous outflow reconstruction using polytetrafluoroethylene graft in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: A single center study
    Patel, Madhukar S.
    Vagefi, Parsia A.
    SURGERY, 2021, 169 (06) : 1510 - 1511
  • [42] Reconstruction of middle hepatic vein in living donor liver transplantation with modified right lobe graft: a single center experience
    Wu, Jian
    Wang, Weilin
    Zhang, Min
    Shen, Yan
    Liang, Tingbo
    Yu, Pengfei
    Xu, Xiao
    Yan, Sheng
    Zheng, Shusen
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 21 (09) : 843 - 849
  • [43] Hemodynamic alterations in anterior segment of liver graft after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation: computed tomography perfusion imaging findings
    Qian, Li Jun
    Zhuang, Zhi Guo
    Cheng, Yu Fan
    Xia, Qiang
    Zhang, Jian Jun
    Xu, Jian Rong
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (05): : 522 - 527
  • [44] Single-Center Experience in Managing Right Liver Grafts From Trifurcation or Independent Right Posterior Portal Vein in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Chen, Cheng-Yen
    Lin, Niang-Cheng
    Liu, Chinsu
    Hsia, Cheng-Yuan
    Loong, Che-Chuan
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2023, 55 (04) : 888 - 892
  • [45] Hemodynamic alterations in anterior segment of liver graft after right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation: computed tomography perfusion imaging findings
    Li Jun Qian
    Zhi Guo Zhuang
    Yu Fan Cheng
    Qiang Xia
    Jian Jun Zhang
    Jian Rong Xu
    Abdominal Imaging, 2010, 35 : 522 - 527
  • [46] Single-Center Experience of Biliary Reconstruction for Multiple Bile Duct in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
    Kim, J-D.
    Choi, D-L.
    Kim, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 : 966 - 966
  • [47] Impact of the Inferior Right Hepatic Veins on Right Liver Lobe Regeneration in Living-Donor Liver Transplant: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scan Analyses in Donors and Recipients
    Pravisani, Riccardo
    Soyama, Akihiko
    Takatsuki, Mitsuhisa
    Hidaka, Masaaki
    Adachi, Tomohiko
    Ono, Shinichiro
    Hara, Takanobu
    Hamada, Takashi
    Eguchi, Susumu
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 17 (06) : 768 - 774
  • [48] Adult right lobe live donor liver transplantation without reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein: A single-center study of 109 cases
    Campsen, Jeffrey
    Hendrickson, Richard J.
    Zimmerman, Michael A.
    Wachs, Michael
    Bak, Thomas
    Russ, Paul
    Bennet, William
    Trotter, James
    Kam, Igal
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 85 (05) : 775 - 777
  • [49] Estimated Blood-Free Weight of Right Hepatic Lobe for Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Accuracy of Automated Blood-Free CT Volumetry
    Kim, Kyoung Won
    Jung, Dong-Hwan
    Park, Jeong Ik
    Song, Gi-Won
    Ha, Tae-Yong
    Moon, Deok-Bog
    Kim, Ki-Hun
    Ahn, Chul-Soo
    Hwang, Shin
    Lee, Sung-Gyu
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (06) : S107 - S107
  • [50] Adult left liver transplantation from split livers and living donors: a 14-year single-center experience
    Boillot, Olivier
    Sagnard, Pierre
    Guillaud, Olivier
    Ber, Charles-Eric
    Pouyet, Michel
    Dumortier, Jerome
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (04) : 571 - 581