Manual and semi-automated computed tomography volumetry significantly overestimates the right liver lobe graft weight: a single-center study with adult living liver donors

被引:0
|
作者
Celik, Hakki [1 ]
Odaman, Hueseyin
Altay, Canan [1 ]
Unek, Tarkan [2 ]
Ozbilgin, Muecahit
Egeli, Tufan [2 ]
Agalar, Cihan [2 ]
Astarcioglu, Ibrahim Kemal [2 ]
Barlik, Funda [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Izmir, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Liver; living donor liver transplantation; manual CT volumetry; semi-automated CT volumetry; transplantation; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.4274/dir.2023.221903
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Preoperative evaluation of donor liver volume is indispensable in living donor liver transplantation to ensure sufficient residual liver and graft -to -recipient weight ratio. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of two computed tomography (CT) volumetry programs, an interactive manual and a semi -automated one, in the preoperative estimation of the right lobe graft weight. METHODS One hundred and nine right liver lobe living donors between January 2008 and January 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two radiologists measured the liver graft volumes independently using manual and semi -automated CT volumetry, and the interaction time was recorded. Actual graft weight (AGW) measured intraoperatively served as the reference standard. The paired samples t -test was used to compare the estimated graft weight (EGW) and the AGW. Inter -user and inter -method agreements were assessed with Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS Both manual and semi -automated CT volumetry significantly overestimated the graft weight (EGW manual: 893 +/- 155 mL vs. AGW manual: 787 +/- 128 g, P < 0.001, EGW semi -automated: 879 +/- 143 mL vs. AGW semi -automated, P < 0.001). The junior radiologist measured higher volumes than the senior radiologist with either method (P < 0.001). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed mean difference and standard deviation for inter -method agreement of 7 +/- 48 cc for the senior radiologist, and 34 +/- 54 cc for the junior radiologist. The mean difference and standard deviation for inter -method agreement was 63 +/- 59 cc in manual volumetry and 22 +/- 38 cc in semi -automated volumetry. The mean interaction time was 27.3 +/- 14.2 min for manual volumetry and 6.8 +/- 1.4 min for semi -automated volumetry (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Both manual and semi -automated CT volumetry significantly overestimated the right liver graft weight, while semi -automated volumetry significantly reduced the interaction time.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long term follow up of 166 adult right lobe living liver donors: A large north American single center experience.
    Adcock, Lesley E.
    Levy, Gary A.
    Grant, David R.
    Cattral, Mark S.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Dubay, Derek A.
    Greig, Paul D.
    Greenwood, Sarah
    Abbey, Susan
    Therapondos, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 : 215 - 215
  • [32] Single center analysis of the first 30 adult to adult living donor liver transplants utilizing the right lobe.
    Marcos, A
    Fisher, RA
    Ham, JM
    Shiffman, ML
    Sanyal, AJ
    Luketic, VA
    Sterling, RK
    Posner, MP
    HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 30 (04) : 220A - 220A
  • [33] Operative outcomes of adult-to-adult right lobe live donor liver transplantation - A comparative study with cadaveric whole-graft liver transplantation in a single center
    Liu, CL
    Fan, ST
    Lo, CM
    Wei, WI
    Chan, SC
    Yong, BH
    Wong, J
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (03) : 404 - 410
  • [34] Postoperative Complications in Living Liver Donors: A Retrospective Study, Single-Center Experience in Saudi Arabia
    Althonaian, Nouf Abdulaziz
    Alsaiari, Alanoud Saleh
    Almanea, Weaam Ahmed
    Alsubaie, Norah Jezaa
    Almuharimi, Awatif Ali
    Althubaiti, Alaa
    Altamimi, Abdulrahman Rashed
    Abdullah, Khalid Omer
    Ohali, Wael Abdulaziz
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES AND TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 30 (02) : 359 - 364
  • [35] Sequential Improvements of Surgical Outcomes in Right Liver Donors for Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Single-Center Experience with 245 Cases.
    Han, Dai Hoon
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Lee, Hyung Soon
    Lee, Ji Eun
    Choi, Jin Sub
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 : S152 - S152
  • [36] Donor safety in adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe: Single center experience in China
    Li, Fu-Gui
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    Zeng, Yong
    Yang, Jia-Yin
    Lin, Qi-Yuan
    Jiang, Xiao-Zhong
    Liu, Bin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 13 (27) : 3752 - 3755
  • [38] Middle Hepatic Vein Allocation in Adult Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single Center Experience
    Zhu, Zhi-Jun
    Shen, Zhong-Yang
    Jiang, Wen-Tao
    Zeng, Zhi-Gui
    Zhang, Ya-Min
    Zhang, Jian-Jun
    Huai, Min-Sheng
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (06) : S235 - S236
  • [39] Congestion Area of the Right Lobe Graft in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Quantitative Evaluation of Hemodynamics Using Computed Tomography Perfusion
    Morita, Koichiro
    Nishie, Akihiro
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Ushijima, Yasuhiro
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Okamoto, Daisuke
    Fujita, Nobuhiro
    Ikegami, Toru
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Ishigami, Kousei
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 53 (05) : 1653 - 1658
  • [40] Risk Factors of SFSS in Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using the Right Liver: A Single-Center Analysis of 217 Cases
    Lei, Jian-Yong
    Wang, Wen-Tao
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (117) : 1491 - 1497