Evaluating the Information Content, Readability, Reliability and Quality of Turkish Websites on Osteoporosis

被引:0
|
作者
Yilmaz, Ramazan [1 ]
Karpuz, Savas [1 ]
Yilmaz, Halim [1 ]
Solak, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Saglik Bilimleri Univ, Konya Beyhekim Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tip & Rehabil Klin, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Saglik Bilimleri Univ, Konya Beyhekim Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Aile Hekimligi Klin, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
Osteoporosis; internet; information quality; readability; reliability; HEALTH INFORMATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; BONE HEALTH; INTERNET; YOUTUBE; VIDEOS; WEB;
D O I
10.4274/tod.galenos.2023.46872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective:To investigate the information content, readability, reliability, and quality level of websites that provide online information in Turkish about osteoporosis (OP). Materials and Methods:In September 2022, the words "osteoporosis, bone melt" were scanned on Google search and the first 20 websites were investigated. The websites were divided into three groups according to the creator: Group 1= hospitals, associations, and official institutions; group 2= health professionals; and group 3= others. The readability level was evaluated according to the Atesman and Bezirci-Yilmaz formula; the reliability and quality were evaluated according to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) scale, the Global Quality scale (GQS), and the Physician Global Quality assessment (PGQA). The information content was analyzed with reference to the subject headings in the patient information texts on the official website of the Turkish Osteoporosis Association. Results:One hundred sixty websites were included in the study; 62 were in group 1, 58 were in group 2, and 40 were in group 3. The median of the Atesman value is 48,2, which is difficult to read; the Bezirci-Yilmaz value was a median of 12,6. The JAMA score was 1,0 and almost all (98,7%) websites were found to be low reliable. Only 10 of the websites had complete information content. The DISCERN score was of poor quality, with a median of 29. It was also found to be of insufficient quality for PGQA and GQS. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of readability, reliability, and quality criteria. Conclusion:Current findings show that Turkish websites are far from providing sufficient and quality information on osteoporosis. Considering the importance of patient education in the management of OP treatment, the results obtained are quite inadequate. Physicians and patients should be aware of this situation; relevant institutions should develop the necessary health policies to solve the problem.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Male Infertility Information on Swedish Fertility Clinics' Websites: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality
    Westerbotn, Margareta
    Sormunen, Taina
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2023, 27 (01) : 53 - 66
  • [42] Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) websites: systematic appraisal of content, quality, readability and suitability of websites for SCAD survivors
    Weddell, J.
    Jawad, D.
    Mansur, Z.
    Redfern, J.
    Buckley, T.
    Gallagher, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2023, 22 : I85 - I85
  • [43] Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma
    Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.
    Hassan, Amr K.
    Hassan, Mohamed A.
    Eleiwa, Taher K.
    Ali, Hossam T.
    Abdelnaem, Salah
    Chauhan, Muhammad Z.
    Shaikh, Omar
    Khouri, Albert S.
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2024, 61 (03) : 198 - 203
  • [44] An Evaluation of the Content Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Publicly Available Web-Based Information on Pneumothorax Surgery in Ireland
    Ho, Martin P.
    Abrar, Samin
    Higgins, Patrick P.
    Doddakula, Kishore K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [45] Quality, Content and Readability Assessment of Patient Education Websites Relating to Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
    Omar, Ahmed
    Passalent, Laura
    Soever, Leslie
    Soowamber, Medha
    Carette, Simon
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69
  • [46] Artificial intelligence insights into osteoporosis: assessing ChatGPT's information quality and readability
    Erden, Yakup
    Temel, Mustafa Huseyin
    Bagcier, Fatih
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [47] Evaluating the Quality, Readability, and Activity of Online Information on Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
    Mehra, Mehul
    Brody, Pierce A.
    Kollapaneni, Sai Suraj
    Sakhalkar, Om
    Rahimi, Scott
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [48] Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease
    Oydanich, Marko
    Kuklinski, Eric
    Asbell, Penny A.
    CORNEA, 2022, 41 (08) : 1023 - 1028
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the mini Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Yilmaz, Figen
    Sahin, Fusun
    Dogu, Beril
    Ozmaden, Asli
    Kuran, Banu
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 25 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [50] The quality of nutritional information available on popular websites: a content analysis
    Ostry, A.
    Young, M. L.
    Hughes, M.
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (04) : 648 - 655