Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma

被引:4
|
作者
Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M. [1 ,2 ,10 ]
Hassan, Amr K. [3 ]
Hassan, Mohamed A. [4 ]
Eleiwa, Taher K. [5 ]
Ali, Hossam T. [6 ]
Abdelnaem, Salah [7 ]
Chauhan, Muhammad Z. [1 ]
Shaikh, Omar [8 ]
Khouri, Albert S. [9 ]
Sallam, Ahmed B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Harvey & Bernice Jones Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA USA
[3] South Valley Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Qena, Egypt
[4] Al Mabaret Al Maadi Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Benha Univ, Benha Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Banha, Egypt
[6] South Valley Univ, Qena Fac Med, Qena, Egypt
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Immunol, Little Rock, AR USA
[8] UT Southwestern Med Sch, Dallas, TX USA
[9] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Inst Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Newark, NJ USA
[10] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Jones Eye Inst, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72207 USA
关键词
PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS; HEALTH INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3928/01913913-20231114-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the quality, reliability, technical quality, and readability of online information related to childhood glaucoma. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, no human sub-jects were studied. Analysis was done for online websites on childhood glaucoma. The terms "childhood glaucoma," "pediatric glaucoma," "congenital glaucoma," "buphthal-mos," and "big eyes" were entered into the Google search engine and the first 100 search results were assessed for quality, reliability, technical quality, and readability. Peer-reviewed articles, patient forum posts, dictionary defini-tions, and websites that appeared as targeted ads, were not in English, or were not focused on humans were ex-cluded. Each website was evaluated for (1) quality and re-liability using the DISCERN, HONcode, and JAMA criteria; (2) technical quality assessing 11 technical aspects; and (3) readability using six separate criteria (Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score and Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index score, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index, Cole-man-Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index).Results:The median scores for the DISCERN, HONcode, and JAMA criteria were 2.6 (range = 1 to 4.75; 1 = worst, 5 = best), 10 (range = 0 to 16; 0 = worst, 16 = best), and 2 (range = 0 to 4; 0 = worst, 4 = best), respectively. The median technical quality score was 0.7. Readabil-ity was poor among most websites, with a median Flesch-Kincaid grade Grade Level Score of 9.3. The me-dian Gunning Fog Index score was 9.8. There was a sta-tistically significantly higher JAMA score and Gunning Fog Index score among the private websites compared to the institutional websites. However, institutional websites had higher technical quality.Conclusions: Online information on childhood glau-coma had poor to moderate quality and reliability. The technical quality is good; however, most websites' read-ability was above the recommended 5th to 6th grade reading level.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma
    Shah, Ronak
    Mahajan, Jasmine
    Oydanich, Marko
    Khouri, Albert S.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2023, 6 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [2] A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma
    Shah, Ronak
    Mahajan, Jasmine
    Oydanich, Marko
    Khouri, Albert S.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (03) : 237 - 237
  • [3] Quality, reliability, technical quality, and readability of online information on pediatric cataract
    Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.
    Hassan, Amr K.
    Hassan, Mohamed A.
    Abdelnaem, Salah
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 49 (12): : 1283 - 1284
  • [4] Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Rhinoplasty
    Ahsanuddin, Salma
    Cadwell, Joshua B.
    Povolotskiy, Roman
    Paskhover, Boris
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : 2019 - 2023
  • [5] Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria
    Eleiwa, Taher K.
    Dihan, Qais A.
    Brown, Andrew D.
    Zaldivar, Ana T.
    Abdelnaem, Seif E.
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    Phillips, Paul H.
    Elnahry, Ayman G.
    Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2024, 61 (05) : 332 - +
  • [6] Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement
    Kucukdurmaz, Fatih
    Gomez, Miguel M.
    Secrist, Eric
    Parvizi, Javad
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2015, 3 (03): : 163 - 168
  • [7] Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
    Hassan, Amr K.
    Eleiwa, Taher K.
    Hassan, Mohamed A.
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    Ali, Hossam T.
    Abdelnaem, Salah
    Gise, Ryan
    Phillips, Paul H.
    Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 45 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [8] Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease
    Oydanich, Marko
    Kuklinski, Eric
    Asbell, Penny A.
    CORNEA, 2022, 41 (08) : 1023 - 1028
  • [9] Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Information on Sjogren's Syndrome
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Hanci, Volkan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [10] Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behcet's disease
    Ozduran, E.
    Hanci, V
    REUMATISMO, 2022, 74 (02) : 49 - 60