Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma

被引:4
|
作者
Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M. [1 ,2 ,10 ]
Hassan, Amr K. [3 ]
Hassan, Mohamed A. [4 ]
Eleiwa, Taher K. [5 ]
Ali, Hossam T. [6 ]
Abdelnaem, Salah [7 ]
Chauhan, Muhammad Z. [1 ]
Shaikh, Omar [8 ]
Khouri, Albert S. [9 ]
Sallam, Ahmed B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Harvey & Bernice Jones Eye Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA USA
[3] South Valley Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Qena, Egypt
[4] Al Mabaret Al Maadi Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Benha Univ, Benha Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Banha, Egypt
[6] South Valley Univ, Qena Fac Med, Qena, Egypt
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Immunol, Little Rock, AR USA
[8] UT Southwestern Med Sch, Dallas, TX USA
[9] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Inst Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Newark, NJ USA
[10] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Jones Eye Inst, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72207 USA
关键词
PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS; HEALTH INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3928/01913913-20231114-01
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the quality, reliability, technical quality, and readability of online information related to childhood glaucoma. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, no human sub-jects were studied. Analysis was done for online websites on childhood glaucoma. The terms "childhood glaucoma," "pediatric glaucoma," "congenital glaucoma," "buphthal-mos," and "big eyes" were entered into the Google search engine and the first 100 search results were assessed for quality, reliability, technical quality, and readability. Peer-reviewed articles, patient forum posts, dictionary defini-tions, and websites that appeared as targeted ads, were not in English, or were not focused on humans were ex-cluded. Each website was evaluated for (1) quality and re-liability using the DISCERN, HONcode, and JAMA criteria; (2) technical quality assessing 11 technical aspects; and (3) readability using six separate criteria (Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score and Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index score, the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index, Cole-man-Liau Index, and Automated Readability Index).Results:The median scores for the DISCERN, HONcode, and JAMA criteria were 2.6 (range = 1 to 4.75; 1 = worst, 5 = best), 10 (range = 0 to 16; 0 = worst, 16 = best), and 2 (range = 0 to 4; 0 = worst, 4 = best), respectively. The median technical quality score was 0.7. Readabil-ity was poor among most websites, with a median Flesch-Kincaid grade Grade Level Score of 9.3. The me-dian Gunning Fog Index score was 9.8. There was a sta-tistically significantly higher JAMA score and Gunning Fog Index score among the private websites compared to the institutional websites. However, institutional websites had higher technical quality.Conclusions: Online information on childhood glau-coma had poor to moderate quality and reliability. The technical quality is good; however, most websites' read-ability was above the recommended 5th to 6th grade reading level.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Olecranon Fractures: Quality and Readability of Information Online
    Hassett, Heather
    McDonagh, Gabrielle
    Crozier-Shaw, Geoff
    Kelly, John
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 : S235 - S235
  • [22] Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia
    Yan Ma
    Albert C. Yang
    Ying Duan
    Ming Dong
    Albert S. Yeung
    Frontiers of Medicine, 2017, 11 : 423 - 431
  • [23] Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis
    Kocyigit, Burhan Fatih
    Koca, Tuba Tulay
    Akaltun, Mazlum Serdar
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 38 (11) : 3269 - 3274
  • [24] Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis
    Burhan Fatih Kocyigit
    Tuba Tulay Koca
    Mazlum Serdar Akaltun
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2019, 38 : 3269 - 3274
  • [25] Evaluation of accuracy, reliability, quality, and readability of online patient information materials on coccyx injury
    Izci, Emir Kaan
    Keskin, Fatih
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (03) : E32685
  • [26] Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus
    Reynolds, M.
    Hoi, A.
    Buchanan, R. R. C.
    LUPUS, 2018, 27 (12) : 1911 - 1917
  • [27] Readability and reliability of Rhinology patient information on Google
    Wu, Johnny
    Hunt, Lyn
    Wood, Andrew J.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 4
  • [28] Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy-Let's Google It: Accessibility, Readability and Quality of Online Information
    Lynch, N.
    Angelov, S.
    Lang, B.
    McGarrigle, S.
    Boyle, T.
    Alazawi, D.
    Connolly, E.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S331 - S332
  • [29] Breast reconstruction post mastectomy: let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information
    Lynch, N. P.
    Angelov, S.
    Lang, B.
    McGarrigle, S. A.
    Al-Azawi, D.
    Boyle, T.
    Connolly, E. M.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 : S119 - S120
  • [30] Readability and quality of online patient health information on parotidectomy
    Tan, J. Y.
    Tan, Y. C.
    Yap, D.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2023, 137 (12): : 1378 - 1383