Evaluating the Information Content, Readability, Reliability and Quality of Turkish Websites on Osteoporosis

被引:0
|
作者
Yilmaz, Ramazan [1 ]
Karpuz, Savas [1 ]
Yilmaz, Halim [1 ]
Solak, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Saglik Bilimleri Univ, Konya Beyhekim Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Fiziksel Tip & Rehabil Klin, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Saglik Bilimleri Univ, Konya Beyhekim Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi, Aile Hekimligi Klin, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
Osteoporosis; internet; information quality; readability; reliability; HEALTH INFORMATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; BONE HEALTH; INTERNET; YOUTUBE; VIDEOS; WEB;
D O I
10.4274/tod.galenos.2023.46872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective:To investigate the information content, readability, reliability, and quality level of websites that provide online information in Turkish about osteoporosis (OP). Materials and Methods:In September 2022, the words "osteoporosis, bone melt" were scanned on Google search and the first 20 websites were investigated. The websites were divided into three groups according to the creator: Group 1= hospitals, associations, and official institutions; group 2= health professionals; and group 3= others. The readability level was evaluated according to the Atesman and Bezirci-Yilmaz formula; the reliability and quality were evaluated according to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) scale, the Global Quality scale (GQS), and the Physician Global Quality assessment (PGQA). The information content was analyzed with reference to the subject headings in the patient information texts on the official website of the Turkish Osteoporosis Association. Results:One hundred sixty websites were included in the study; 62 were in group 1, 58 were in group 2, and 40 were in group 3. The median of the Atesman value is 48,2, which is difficult to read; the Bezirci-Yilmaz value was a median of 12,6. The JAMA score was 1,0 and almost all (98,7%) websites were found to be low reliable. Only 10 of the websites had complete information content. The DISCERN score was of poor quality, with a median of 29. It was also found to be of insufficient quality for PGQA and GQS. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of readability, reliability, and quality criteria. Conclusion:Current findings show that Turkish websites are far from providing sufficient and quality information on osteoporosis. Considering the importance of patient education in the management of OP treatment, the results obtained are quite inadequate. Physicians and patients should be aware of this situation; relevant institutions should develop the necessary health policies to solve the problem.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 116
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Readability of websites containing information on dental implants
    Jayaratne, Yasas S. N.
    Anderson, Nina K.
    Zwahlen, Roger A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (12) : 1319 - 1324
  • [32] Quality, reliability, and readability of internet-sourced acne information
    Fotouhi, Audrey
    Darian, Talin R.
    Nissan, Michael E.
    Davuley, Steven
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 81 (04) : AB113 - AB113
  • [33] Content and Quality of Information Provided on Canadian Dementia Websites
    Dillon, Whitney A.
    Prorok, Jeanette C.
    Seitz, Dallas P.
    CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL, 2013, 16 (01): : 6 - 15
  • [34] Reliability, Readability and Quality of Online Information about Femoracetabular Impingement
    Kucukdurmaz, Fatih
    Gomez, Miguel M.
    Secrist, Eric
    Parvizi, Javad
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2015, 3 (03): : 163 - 168
  • [35] Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
    Hassan, Amr K.
    Eleiwa, Taher K.
    Hassan, Mohamed A.
    Sallam, Ahmed B.
    Ali, Hossam T.
    Abdelnaem, Salah
    Gise, Ryan
    Phillips, Paul H.
    Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 45 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [36] Evaluating the Accuracy, Quality, and Readability of Online Breast Cancer Information
    Valencia, Elsie Antuna
    Cortina, Chandler
    Cobb, Adrienne
    Chaudhary, Lubna
    Kelly, Tracy
    Kong, Amanda
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S575 - S576
  • [37] Evaluation of quality and readability of online patient information on osteoporosis and osteoporosis drug treatment and recommendations for improvement
    Crawford-Manning, F.
    Greenall, C.
    Hawarden, A.
    Bullock, L.
    Leyland, S.
    Jinks, C.
    Protheroe, J.
    Paskins, Z.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 32 (08) : 1567 - 1584
  • [38] Evaluation of quality and readability of online patient information on osteoporosis and osteoporosis drug treatment and recommendations for improvement
    F. Crawford-Manning
    C. Greenall
    A. Hawarden
    L. Bullock
    S. Leyland
    C. Jinks
    J. Protheroe
    Z. Paskins
    Osteoporosis International, 2021, 32 : 1567 - 1584
  • [39] Male infertility information on Swedish fertility clinics' websites: An evaluation of readability, suitability, and quality
    Westerbotn, M.
    Sormunen, T.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [40] How good is online information on fibromyalgia? An analysis of quality and readability of websites on fibromyalgia in Spanish
    Alioshkin Cheneguin, Arturo
    Salvat Salvat, Isabel
    Romay Barrero, Helena
    Torres Lacomba, Maria
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07): : e037065