Trends, challenges, and success factors in pharmaceutical portfolio management: Cognitive biases in decision-making and their mitigating measures

被引:2
|
作者
Bieske, Linn [1 ]
Zinner, Maximillian [1 ]
Dahlhausen, Florian [1 ]
Truebel, Hubert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Herdecke, Germany
[2] Knowledge House GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
portfolio management; decision process quality; cognitive biases; bias mitigating measures; R&D pipeline management; pharmaceutical industry; DRUG DISCOVERY; DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTIVITY; GENDER; PERFORMANCE; EVOLUTION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103734
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Effective portfolio management is crucial for innovation and sustaining revenue in pharmaceutical companies. This article holistically reviews trends, challenges, and approaches to pharmaceutical portfolio management and focuses, in particular, on cognitive biases in portfolio decision-making. Portfolio managers strongly rely on external innovation and face increasing competitive pressure and portfolio complexity. The ability to address biases and make robust decisions remains a challenge. Portfolio management practitioners most commonly face confirmation bias, champion bias, or misaligned incentives, which they seek to mitigate through expert input, team diversity, and rewarding truth-seeking. Ultimately, highest-quality portfolio management decision-making could be enabled by three factors: high-quality data, structured review processes, and comprehensive mitigating measures against biases in decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Challenges in Decision-Making Modelling for New Product Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry
    Marques, Catarina M.
    Moniz, Samuel
    de Sousa, Jorge Pinho
    29TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT B, 2019, 46 : 1411 - 1416
  • [42] Research on Cognitive Biases of Improvised Decision-Making Based on "Scenario-Coping With"
    Meng, Tian
    Xue, Yaowen
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, : 627 - 635
  • [43] Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review
    Acciarini, Chiara
    Brunetta, Federica
    Boccardelli, Paolo
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (03) : 638 - 652
  • [44] International market selection by small enterprises: Cognitive biases and heuristics in decision-making
    Likhareva, Natalya D.
    Gafforova, Elena B.
    Novikov, Igor A.
    UPRAVLENETS-THE MANAGER, 2022, 13 (01): : 84 - 99
  • [45] Veterinary clinical decision-making: cognitive biases, external constraints, and strategies for improvement
    McKenzie, Brennen A.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 244 (03): : 271 - 276
  • [46] Clinical decision-making: Cognitive biases and heuristics in triage decisions in the emergency department
    Kapuralalage, Thilini Nisansala Egoda
    Chan, Ho Fai
    Dulleck, Uwe
    Hughes, James A.
    Torgler, Benno
    Whyte, Stephen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2025, 92 : 60 - 67
  • [47] The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas
    Berthet, Vincent
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [48] A Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce the Effects of Cognitive Biases in the Decision-Making of Audiologists
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Featherston, Rebecca J.
    Downie, Laura E.
    Vogel, Adam P.
    Hamilton, Bridget
    Granger, Catherine
    Shlonsky, Aron
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 158 - 165
  • [49] Decision-making styles and cognitive biases: Experimental results from a Korean sample
    Kim, Bum Seok
    Kim, Woosub
    Min, Jae H.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2025, 114
  • [50] On Modeling Cognitive and Affective Factors in Legal Decision-making
    Indurkhya, Bipin
    Misztal-Radecka, Joanna
    LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 279 : 157 - 160