Trends, challenges, and success factors in pharmaceutical portfolio management: Cognitive biases in decision-making and their mitigating measures

被引:2
|
作者
Bieske, Linn [1 ]
Zinner, Maximillian [1 ]
Dahlhausen, Florian [1 ]
Truebel, Hubert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Fac Hlth, Herdecke, Germany
[2] Knowledge House GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
portfolio management; decision process quality; cognitive biases; bias mitigating measures; R&D pipeline management; pharmaceutical industry; DRUG DISCOVERY; DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTIVITY; GENDER; PERFORMANCE; EVOLUTION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103734
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Effective portfolio management is crucial for innovation and sustaining revenue in pharmaceutical companies. This article holistically reviews trends, challenges, and approaches to pharmaceutical portfolio management and focuses, in particular, on cognitive biases in portfolio decision-making. Portfolio managers strongly rely on external innovation and face increasing competitive pressure and portfolio complexity. The ability to address biases and make robust decisions remains a challenge. Portfolio management practitioners most commonly face confirmation bias, champion bias, or misaligned incentives, which they seek to mitigate through expert input, team diversity, and rewarding truth-seeking. Ultimately, highest-quality portfolio management decision-making could be enabled by three factors: high-quality data, structured review processes, and comprehensive mitigating measures against biases in decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical decision-making: heuristics and cognitive biases for the ophthalmologist
    Hussain, Ahsen
    Oestreicher, James
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [22] Mitigating bias in pharmaceutical R&D decision-making
    Hubert Truebel
    Mark Seidler
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2022, 21 : 874 - 875
  • [23] Mitigating bias in pharmaceutical R&D decision-making
    Truebel, Hubert
    Seidler, Mark
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2022, 21 (12) : 874 - 875
  • [24] Application of portfolio management to bidding decision-making
    School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
    不详
    Wuhan Ligong Daxue Xuebao, 2008, 6 (170-173):
  • [25] Connected Cognitive Entity Management New Challenges for Executive Decision-Making
    Dory, Tibor
    Waldbuesser, Patrick
    2015 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM), 2015, : 235 - 240
  • [26] Cognitive biases in project risk management: A Bayesian Network approach for optimised decision-making
    Wang, Jianqi
    Yan, Jieni
    Chen, Jia
    Xu, Yinzhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 155 - 155
  • [27] Computational Method for Corrective Mechanism of Cognitive Decision-Making Biases
    Foeldesi, Peter
    Botzheim, Janos
    3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM 2012), 2012, : 211 - 215
  • [28] Exploring cognitive biases and psychological influences in legal decision-making
    Wei, Weiyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 119 - 119
  • [29] THE INSANITY PLEA - COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL BIASES IN JURY DECISION-MAKING
    ROWE, K
    BAINS, GS
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (DEC): : A101 - A101
  • [30] Recommendations for conditional release suitability: Cognitive biases and consistency in case management officers' decision-making
    Samra-Grewal, J
    Pfeifer, JE
    Ogloff, JRP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CRIMINOLOGIE, 2000, 42 (04): : 421 - 447