A Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce the Effects of Cognitive Biases in the Decision-Making of Audiologists

被引:5
|
作者
Galvin, Karyn L. [1 ]
Featherston, Rebecca J. [2 ]
Downie, Laura E. [3 ]
Vogel, Adam P. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hamilton, Bridget [8 ]
Granger, Catherine [9 ]
Shlonsky, Aron [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Audiol & Speech Pathol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Social Work, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Neurosci Speech, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Redenlab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Neurodegenerat, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Ctr Neurol, Tubingen, Germany
[8] Univ Melbourne, Dept Nursing, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
audiology; audiologists; clinical decision-making; cognitive bias; HEURISTICS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.18096
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Audiologists are constantly making decisions that are key to optimizing client/patient outcomes, and these decisions may be vulnerable to cognitive biases. Purpose: The purpose was to determine the present state of knowledge within the field of audiology regarding the potential impact of cognitive biases on clinical decision-making and the use of interventions to reduce such impact. Research Design: A systematic review was conducted to identify and consider the outcomes of all studies in which an intervention, strategy, or procedure was implemented with the aim of reducing the impact of cognitive biases on the decision-making of audiologists. Data Collection: The review was part of a larger scale search which included the broader disciplines of health science and medicine. Electronic database searches were supplemented by citation searches of relevant reviews and a gray literature search. Following title and abstract screening, 201 full-text studies were considered for inclusion. Results: No studies were found which fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Conclusions: Despite initial calls to respond to these types of cognitive biases being made three decades ago, no peer-reviewed scientific studies testing strategies to reduce the impact of cognitive biases on the decision-making of audiologists were found. There is a clear need for a more concerted research effort in this area if audiologists are to consistently deliver truly evidence-based care.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review
    Acciarini, Chiara
    Brunetta, Federica
    Boccardelli, Paolo
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2021, 59 (03) : 638 - 652
  • [2] Interventions to Mitigate Cognitive Biases in the Decision Making of Eye Care Professionals: A Systematic Review
    Shlonsky, Aron
    Featherston, Rebecca
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Vogel, Adam P.
    Granger, Catherine L.
    Lewis, Courtney
    Luong, My-Linh
    Downie, Laura E.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2019, 96 (11) : 818 - 824
  • [3] How Cognitive Biases Affect XAI-assisted Decision-making: A Systematic Review
    Bertrand, Astrid
    Belloum, Rafik
    Eagan, James R.
    Maxwell, Winston
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, : 78 - 91
  • [4] Cognitive Biases in Cyber Decision-Making
    Lemay, Antoine
    Leblanc, Sylvain
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2018), 2018, : 395 - 401
  • [5] COGNITIVE BIASES IN DECISION-MAKING OF ENTREPRENEURS
    Zelienkova, Andrea
    PROCEEDINGS OF 10TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: COMPETITION, 2018, : 426 - 433
  • [6] Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review
    Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio
    Alcazar-Corcoles, Miguel A.
    Albein-Urios, Natalia
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 29 (01) : 79 - 92
  • [7] Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review
    Antonio Verdejo-García
    Miguel A. Alcázar-Córcoles
    Natalia Albein-Urios
    Neuropsychology Review, 2019, 29 : 79 - 92
  • [8] Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review
    Thirsk, M. Lorraine
    Panchuk, T. Julia
    Stahlke, Sarah
    Hagtvedt, Reidar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 133
  • [9] Cognitive Biases in Humanitarian Sensemaking and Decision-Making
    Comes, Tina
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE METHODS IN SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION SUPPORT (COGSIMA), 2016, : 56 - 62
  • [10] Propranolol, cognitive biases, and practical decision-making
    Craigie, Jillian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2007, 7 (09): : 31 - 32