A Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce the Effects of Cognitive Biases in the Decision-Making of Audiologists

被引:5
|
作者
Galvin, Karyn L. [1 ]
Featherston, Rebecca J. [2 ]
Downie, Laura E. [3 ]
Vogel, Adam P. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hamilton, Bridget [8 ]
Granger, Catherine [9 ]
Shlonsky, Aron [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Audiol & Speech Pathol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Social Work, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Neurosci Speech, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Redenlab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Neurodegenerat, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Ctr Neurol, Tubingen, Germany
[8] Univ Melbourne, Dept Nursing, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
audiology; audiologists; clinical decision-making; cognitive bias; HEURISTICS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.18096
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Audiologists are constantly making decisions that are key to optimizing client/patient outcomes, and these decisions may be vulnerable to cognitive biases. Purpose: The purpose was to determine the present state of knowledge within the field of audiology regarding the potential impact of cognitive biases on clinical decision-making and the use of interventions to reduce such impact. Research Design: A systematic review was conducted to identify and consider the outcomes of all studies in which an intervention, strategy, or procedure was implemented with the aim of reducing the impact of cognitive biases on the decision-making of audiologists. Data Collection: The review was part of a larger scale search which included the broader disciplines of health science and medicine. Electronic database searches were supplemented by citation searches of relevant reviews and a gray literature search. Following title and abstract screening, 201 full-text studies were considered for inclusion. Results: No studies were found which fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Conclusions: Despite initial calls to respond to these types of cognitive biases being made three decades ago, no peer-reviewed scientific studies testing strategies to reduce the impact of cognitive biases on the decision-making of audiologists were found. There is a clear need for a more concerted research effort in this area if audiologists are to consistently deliver truly evidence-based care.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interventions Encouraging the Use of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Decision-Making: A Systematic Review
    Laure Perrier
    Kelly Mrklas
    Sasha Shepperd
    Maureen Dobbins
    K. Ann McKibbon
    Sharon E. Straus
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011, 26 : 419 - 426
  • [22] Interventions Encouraging the Use of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Decision-Making: A Systematic Review
    Perrier, Laure
    Mrklas, Kelly
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Dobbins, Maureen
    McKibbon, K. Ann
    Straus, Sharon E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 (04) : 419 - 426
  • [23] Interventions to Mitigate Bias in Social Work Decision-Making: A Systematic Review
    Featherston, Rebecca Jean
    Shlonsky, Aron
    Lewis, Courtney
    Luong, My-Linh
    Downie, Laura E.
    Vogel, Adam P.
    Granger, Catherine
    Hamilton, Bridget
    Galvin, Karyn
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2019, 29 (07) : 741 - 752
  • [24] Rationality in medical decision making: a review of the literature on doctors' decision-making biases
    Bornstein, BH
    Emler, AC
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (02) : 97 - 107
  • [25] Computational Method for Corrective Mechanism of Cognitive Decision-Making Biases
    Foeldesi, Peter
    Botzheim, Janos
    3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM 2012), 2012, : 211 - 215
  • [26] Measuring behavioral biases in individual investors decision-making and sociodemographic correlations: a systematic review
    Cardoso, Nicolas de Oliveira
    Salvador, Eduarda Zorgi
    Broch, Gustavo
    Mette, Frederike Monika Budiner
    Yoshinaga, Claudia Emiko
    Machado, Wagner de Lara
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2024, 16 (04) : 636 - 659
  • [27] Exploring cognitive biases and psychological influences in legal decision-making
    Wei, Weiyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 119 - 119
  • [28] THE INSANITY PLEA - COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL BIASES IN JURY DECISION-MAKING
    ROWE, K
    BAINS, GS
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (DEC): : A101 - A101
  • [29] Systematic biases in group decision-making: implications for patient safety
    Mannion, Russell
    Thompson, Carl
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (06) : 606 - 612
  • [30] Modeling decision-making biases
    McShane, Marjorie
    Nirenburg, Sergei
    Jarrell, Bruce
    BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES, 2013, 3 : 39 - 50