A Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce the Effects of Cognitive Biases in the Decision-Making of Audiologists

被引:5
|
作者
Galvin, Karyn L. [1 ]
Featherston, Rebecca J. [2 ]
Downie, Laura E. [3 ]
Vogel, Adam P. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hamilton, Bridget [8 ]
Granger, Catherine [9 ]
Shlonsky, Aron [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Audiol & Speech Pathol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Social Work, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Optometry & Vis Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Neurosci Speech, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Redenlab, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Tubingen, Hertie Inst Clin Brain Res, Dept Neurodegenerat, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Ctr Neurol, Tubingen, Germany
[8] Univ Melbourne, Dept Nursing, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
audiology; audiologists; clinical decision-making; cognitive bias; HEURISTICS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.18096
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Audiologists are constantly making decisions that are key to optimizing client/patient outcomes, and these decisions may be vulnerable to cognitive biases. Purpose: The purpose was to determine the present state of knowledge within the field of audiology regarding the potential impact of cognitive biases on clinical decision-making and the use of interventions to reduce such impact. Research Design: A systematic review was conducted to identify and consider the outcomes of all studies in which an intervention, strategy, or procedure was implemented with the aim of reducing the impact of cognitive biases on the decision-making of audiologists. Data Collection: The review was part of a larger scale search which included the broader disciplines of health science and medicine. Electronic database searches were supplemented by citation searches of relevant reviews and a gray literature search. Following title and abstract screening, 201 full-text studies were considered for inclusion. Results: No studies were found which fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Conclusions: Despite initial calls to respond to these types of cognitive biases being made three decades ago, no peer-reviewed scientific studies testing strategies to reduce the impact of cognitive biases on the decision-making of audiologists were found. There is a clear need for a more concerted research effort in this area if audiologists are to consistently deliver truly evidence-based care.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review of decision-making in remanufacturing
    Rizova, Mirena Isaeva
    Wong, T. C.
    Ijomah, Winifred
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 147 (147)
  • [42] A Systematic Review of Epidural Decision-Making
    Quach, D.
    Van der Lugt, B.
    Ananthram, H.
    Rane, A.
    Ray, R.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 : 19 - 19
  • [44] Decision-making for children and adolescents: a scoping review of interventions increasing participation in decision-making
    Bosch, Inga
    Siebel, Hermann
    Heiser, Maike
    Inhestern, Laura
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [45] Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in Medical Decision Making: A Critical Review Using a Systematic Search Strategy
    Blumenthal-Barby, J. S.
    Krieger, Heather
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) : 539 - 557
  • [46] Conflict before the courtroom: challenging cognitive biases in critical decision-making
    Johal, Harleen Kaur
    Danbury, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 47 (12) : E36
  • [47] Decision-making in criminal justice in the light of the psychology: heuristics and cognitive biases
    Andrade, Flavio da Silva
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL PENAL, 2019, 5 (01) : 507 - 540
  • [48] Current Trends in International Research on Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making Processes
    Loginov, N., I
    Aleksandrova, A., I
    PSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 17 (03): : 444 - 453
  • [49] Inventory decision-making biases: a review and suggestions for future research
    Yamini, S.
    Gajanand, M. S.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (06) : 1889 - 1912
  • [50] Interventions to support shared decision-making for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review
    Zandstr, D.
    Busser, J. A. S.
    Aarts, J. W. M.
    Nieboer, T. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 211 : 156 - 163