Taylor Polynomial Enhancer using Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression

被引:2
|
作者
Chang, Chi-Hsien [1 ]
Chiang, Tu-Chin [1 ]
Hsu, Tzu-Hao [1 ]
Chuang, Ting-Shuo [1 ]
Fang, Wen-Zhong [1 ]
Yu, Tian-Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Taiwan Evolutionary Intelligence LAB, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Genetic programming; Symbolic regression; Taylor polynomial;
D O I
10.1145/3583133.3590591
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Unlike most research of symbolic regression with genetic programming (GP) concerning black-box optimization, this paper focuses on the scenario where the underlying function is available, but due to limited computational resources or product imperfection, the function needs to be approximated with simplicity to fit measured data. Taylor polynomial (TP) is commonly used in such scenario; however, its performance drops drastically away from the expansion point. On the other hand, solely using GP does not utilize the knowledge of the underlying function, even though possibly inaccurate. This paper proposes using GP as a TP enhancer, namely TPE-GP, to combine the advantages from TP and GP. Specifically, TPE-GP utilizes infinite-order operators to compensate the power of TP with finite order. Empirically, on functions that are expressible by TP, TP outperformed both gplearn and TPE-GP as expected, while TPE-GP outperformed gplearn due to the use of TP. On functions that are not expressible by TP but expressible by the function set (FS), TPE-GP was competitive with gplearn while both outperformed TP. Finally, on functions that are not expressible by both TP and FS, TPE-GP outperformed both TP and gplearn, indicating the hybrid did achieve the synergy effect from TP and GP.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 546
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Symbolic Regression via Control Variable Genetic Programming
    Jiang, Nan
    Xue, Yexiang
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES: RESEARCH TRACK, ECML PKDD 2023, PT IV, 2023, 14172 : 178 - 195
  • [32] Cartesian Genetic Programming with Module Mutation for Symbolic Regression
    Kushida, Jun-ichi
    Hara, Akira
    Takahama, Tetsuyuki
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 159 - 164
  • [33] Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression of Chemical Process Systems
    Babu, B. V.
    Karthik, S.
    ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2007, 14 (02)
  • [34] Using Genetic Programming with Prior Formula Knowledge to Solve Symbolic Regression Problem
    Lu, Qiang
    Ren, Jun
    Wang, Zhiguang
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 2016
  • [35] An Efficient Federated Genetic Programming Framework for Symbolic Regression
    Dong, Junlan
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Chen, Wei-Neng
    Zhang, Jun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 7 (03): : 858 - 871
  • [36] Population Dynamics in Genetic Programming for Dynamic Symbolic Regression
    Fleck, Philipp
    Werth, Bernhard
    Affenzeller, Michael
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [37] A new hybrid structure genetic programming in symbolic regression
    Xiong, SW
    Wang, WW
    CEC: 2003 CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1500 - 1506
  • [38] An efficient memetic genetic programming framework for symbolic regression
    Cheng, Tiantian
    Zhong, Jinghui
    MEMETIC COMPUTING, 2020, 12 (04) : 299 - 315
  • [39] An efficient memetic genetic programming framework for symbolic regression
    Tiantian Cheng
    Jinghui Zhong
    Memetic Computing, 2020, 12 : 299 - 315
  • [40] Semantic schema based genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Zojaji, Zahra
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Nasiri, Hamid
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 122