How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices

被引:3
|
作者
Rutherford, Claudia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ju, Angela [2 ]
Kim, Bora [3 ]
Wiltink, Lisette [4 ]
Acret, Louise [1 ,3 ]
White, Kate [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Susan Wakil Sch Nursing, Canc Care Res Unit CCRU, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sch Psychol, Qual Life Off, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Bowel cancer; Qualitative study; Symptoms; Treatment effects; Survivorship; OF-LIFE; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeColorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives.MethodsThis qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews.ResultsWe interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians' worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care.ConclusionsTo improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] “It is about how the net looks”: a qualitative study of perceptions and practices related to mosquito net care and repair in two districts in eastern Uganda
    Leah Scandurra
    Angela Acosta
    Hannah Koenker
    Daniel Musoke Kibuuka
    Steven Harvey
    Malaria Journal, 13
  • [42] "It is about how the net looks": a qualitative study of perceptions and practices related to mosquito net care and repair in two districts in eastern Uganda
    Scandurra, Leah
    Acosta, Angela
    Koenker, Hannah
    Kibuuka, Daniel Musoke
    Harvey, Steven
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2014, 13
  • [43] Unmet needs of patients during colorectal cancer care and treatment - a qualitative study through an online patient community
    Samalin, E.
    Lorenzon, L.
    de Menthiere, C. Sarrauste
    Gueroult-Accolas, L.
    Paixao, R.
    Almagro, C. Chaves
    Pain, E.
    Martinelli, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S50 - S50
  • [44] A Qualitative Study Among Healthcare Providers on Risks Associated With the Use of Supportive Care for Cancer Treatment-Related Symptoms in Children and Adolescents
    Mora, Dana C.
    Kristoffersen, Agnete E.
    Jong, Miek C.
    Hervik, Jill A.
    Stub, Trine
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2023, 22
  • [45] Perspectives of primary care providers and endoscopists about current practices, facilitators and barriers for preparation and follow-up of colonoscopy procedures: a qualitative study
    Gayle Restall
    John R Walker
    Celeste Waldman
    Kathleen Zawaly
    Valerie Michaud
    Dana Moffat
    Harminder Singh
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [46] Perspectives of primary care providers and endoscopists about current practices, facilitators and barriers for preparation and follow-up of colonoscopy procedures: a qualitative study
    Restall, Gayle
    Walker, John R.
    Waldman, Celeste
    Zawaly, Kathleen
    Michaud, Valerie
    Moffat, Dana
    Singh, Harminder
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [47] Cryopreservation of reproductive material before cancer treatment: a qualitative study of health care professionals’ views about ways to enhance clinical care
    Karin Hammarberg
    Maggie Kirkman
    Catharyn Stern
    Robert I. McLachlan
    Debra Gook
    Luk Rombauts
    Beverley Vollenhoven
    Jane R. W. Fisher
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [48] Cryopreservation of reproductive material before cancer treatment: a qualitative study of health care professionals' views about ways to enhance clinical care
    Hammarberg, Karin
    Kirkman, Maggie
    Stern, Catharyn
    McLachlan, Robert I.
    Gook, Debra
    Rombauts, Luk
    Vollenhoven, Beverley
    Fisher, Jane R. W.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [49] How do contextual factors influence quality and safety work in the Norwegian home care and nursing home settings? A qualitative study about managers' experiences
    Ree, Eline
    Johannessen, Terese
    Wiig, Siri
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [50] Survivorship care and support following treatment for breast cancer: a multi-ethnic comparative qualitative study of women’s experiences
    Charlotte Tompkins
    Karen Scanlon
    Emma Scott
    Emma Ream
    Seeromanie Harding
    Jo Armes
    BMC Health Services Research, 16