共 50 条
How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices
被引:3
|作者:
Rutherford, Claudia
[1
,2
,3
]
Ju, Angela
[2
]
Kim, Bora
[3
]
Wiltink, Lisette
[4
]
Acret, Louise
[1
,3
]
White, Kate
[1
,3
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sydney, Susan Wakil Sch Nursing, Canc Care Res Unit CCRU, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sch Psychol, Qual Life Off, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Australia
关键词:
Bowel cancer;
Qualitative study;
Symptoms;
Treatment effects;
Survivorship;
OF-LIFE;
INTERVENTIONS;
D O I:
10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
PurposeColorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives.MethodsThis qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews.ResultsWe interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians' worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care.ConclusionsTo improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文