How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices

被引:3
|
作者
Rutherford, Claudia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ju, Angela [2 ]
Kim, Bora [3 ]
Wiltink, Lisette [4 ]
Acret, Louise [1 ,3 ]
White, Kate [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Susan Wakil Sch Nursing, Canc Care Res Unit CCRU, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sch Psychol, Qual Life Off, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, Sydney, Australia
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Bowel cancer; Qualitative study; Symptoms; Treatment effects; Survivorship; OF-LIFE; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeColorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives.MethodsThis qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews.ResultsWe interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians' worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care.ConclusionsTo improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What is different about living alone with cancer in older age? A qualitative study of experiences and preferences for care
    Hanratty, Barbara
    Addington-Hall, Julia
    Arthur, Antony
    Cooper, Lucy
    Grande, Gunn
    Payne, Sheila
    Seymour, Jane
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 14
  • [22] What is different about living alone with cancer in older age? A qualitative study of experiences and preferences for care
    Barbara Hanratty
    Julia Addington-Hall
    Antony Arthur
    Lucy Cooper
    Gunn Grande
    Sheila Payne
    Jane Seymour
    BMC Family Practice, 14
  • [23] Supportive care needs of patients following diagnosis and treatment for colorectal cancer: results from the UK ColoREctal Wellbeing Study CREW cohort study
    Sodergren, Samantha
    Patel, Mubarak
    Wheelwright, Sally
    Calman, Lynn
    Winter, Jane
    Din, Amy
    Smith, Peter
    Richardson, Alison
    Fenlon, Deborah
    Foster, Claire
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 7 - 8
  • [24] How are decisions made in cancer care? A qualitative study using participant observation of current practice
    Hahlweg, Pola
    Haerter, Martin
    Nestoriuc, Yvonne
    Scholl, Isabelle
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [25] Decision making and referral from primary care for possible lung and colorectal cancer: a qualitative study of patients' experiences
    Banks, Jon
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Hall, Nicola
    Mills, Katie
    Hamilton, William
    Turner, Katrina M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (629): : E775 - E782
  • [26] Knowledge and awareness of long-term and late treatment consequences amongst colorectal cancer survivors: A qualitative study
    Brown, Sarah
    Greenfield, Diana
    Thompson, Joanne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2016, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [27] A qualitative study about cancer outpatients' experiences with selective taste control of bread as a self-care intervention
    Corremans, Marleen
    Goossens, Edwig
    Adriaenssens, Jef
    Mortelmans, Dimitri
    Geurden, Bart
    NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (06): : 2683 - 2689
  • [28] Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care
    Greene, Preston A.
    Sayre, George
    Heffner, Jaimee L.
    Klein, Deborah E.
    Krebs, Paul
    Au, David H.
    Zeliadt, Steven B.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2019, 34 (06) : 1142 - 1149
  • [29] Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care
    Preston A. Greene
    George Sayre
    Jaimee L. Heffner
    Deborah E. Klein
    Paul Krebs
    David H. Au
    Steven B. Zeliadt
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2019, 34 : 1142 - 1149
  • [30] Patients' Experiences in a Newly Established Clinic for Late Complications after Colorectal and Anal Cancer Treatment: A Qualitative Study
    Oggesen, Birthe Thing
    Akbar, Momena
    Hamberg, Marie Louise Sjodin
    Thomsen, Thordis
    Danielsen, Anne Kjaergaard
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2023, 2023