Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hertz, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Rattenborg, Soren [2 ,4 ]
Haug, Tora R. [5 ,6 ]
Houlind, Kim [2 ,7 ]
Konge, Lars [3 ,8 ]
Bjerrum, Flemming [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark DK, Hosp Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Vasc Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Surg Sect, Gastrounit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
appendectomy; assessment; colorectal surgery; competency; education; simulation; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SURGICAL SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16905
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThere is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.MethodA systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.ResultsFifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Training and Assessment of Hysteroscopic Skills: A Systematic Review
    Savran, Mona Meral
    Sorensen, Stine Maya Dreier
    Konge, Lars
    Tolsgaard, Martin G.
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 73 (05) : 906 - 918
  • [42] Pediatric incidental appendectomy: a systematic review
    Healy, James M.
    Olgun, Lena F.
    Hittelman, Adam B.
    Ozgediz, Doruk
    Caty, Michael G.
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 32 (04) : 321 - 335
  • [43] Transvaginal Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review
    Slouha, Ethan
    Biput, Stefan J.
    Krumbach, Brandon
    Clunes, Lucy A.
    Kollias, Theofanis F.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [44] Pediatric incidental appendectomy: a systematic review
    James M. Healy
    Lena F. Olgun
    Adam B. Hittelman
    Doruk Ozgediz
    Michael G. Caty
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2016, 32 : 321 - 335
  • [45] A curriculum map of colorectal surgery: an assessment of training expectations and the reality
    C May
    BMC Proceedings, 6 (Suppl 4)
  • [46] Complications of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in acute care surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Al Busaidi, Omar
    Lee, Seungwon
    Kortbeek, John B.
    Turin, Tanvir C.
    Stelfox, Henry T.
    Austen, Lea
    Ball, Chad G.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 89 (03): : 576 - 584
  • [47] Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review
    Nachiappan, Subramanian
    Askari, Alan
    Currie, Andrew
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    Faiz, Omar
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (09): : 2513 - 2530
  • [48] Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review
    Subramanian Nachiappan
    Alan Askari
    Andrew Currie
    Robin H. Kennedy
    Omar Faiz
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2513 - 2530
  • [49] Cadaveric Simulation Training in Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Robinson, Davida A.
    Piekut, Diane T.
    Hasman, Linda
    Knight, Peter A.
    ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2020, 13 (03) : 406 - 418
  • [50] Laparoscopic appendectomy vs open appendectomy during pregnancy: a systematic review
    Rountis, A.
    Dimitroulis, D.
    Nikiteas, N.
    HIPPOKRATIA, 2022, 26 (01) : 1 - 6