Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hertz, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Rattenborg, Soren [2 ,4 ]
Haug, Tora R. [5 ,6 ]
Houlind, Kim [2 ,7 ]
Konge, Lars [3 ,8 ]
Bjerrum, Flemming [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark DK, Hosp Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Vasc Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Surg Sect, Gastrounit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
appendectomy; assessment; colorectal surgery; competency; education; simulation; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SURGICAL SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16905
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThere is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.MethodA systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.ResultsFifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of outcome reporting in colorectal cancer surgery
    Whistance, R. N.
    Forsythe, R. O.
    McNair, A. G. K.
    Brookes, S. T.
    Avery, K. N. L.
    Pullyblank, A. M.
    Sylvester, P. A.
    Jayne, D. G.
    Jones, J. E.
    Brown, J.
    Coleman, M. G.
    Dutton, S. J.
    Hackett, R.
    Huxtable, R.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    Morton, D.
    Oliver, A.
    Russell, A.
    Thomas, M. G.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (10) : e548 - e560
  • [32] Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review
    Ng, Zi Qin
    Tan, Patrick
    Theophilus, Mary
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S99 - S99
  • [33] Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review
    Ng, Zi Qin
    Tan, Patrick
    Theophilus, Mary
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (10) : 2519 - 2531
  • [34] The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Khamar, Jigish
    Daniel, Ryan
    Lee, Yung
    Park, Lily
    Doumouras, Aristithes G.
    Hong, Dennis
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 325 - 334
  • [35] A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery
    Rawlinson, A.
    Kang, P.
    Evans, J.
    Khanna, A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2011, 93 (08) : 583 - 588
  • [36] Prolonged Ileus after Colorectal Surgery, a Systematic Review
    Shereef, Anzil
    Raftery, David
    Sneddon, Fraser
    Emslie, Katy
    Mair, Lyn
    Mackay, Craig
    Ramsay, George
    Forget, Patrice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [37] Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease
    Yong, L
    Deane, M
    Monson, JRT
    Darzi, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 : 56 - 56
  • [38] Systematic Review on Mentoring and Simulation in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Wyles, Susannah M.
    Ni, Melody
    Darzi, Ara W.
    Hanna, George B.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (06) : 943 - 951
  • [39] Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis G.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (06): : 478 - 483
  • [40] Simulation for Training and Assessment in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review
    Gambadauro, Pietro
    Milenkovic, Milan
    Hadlaczky, Gergo
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : 963 - 973