Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hertz, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Rattenborg, Soren [2 ,4 ]
Haug, Tora R. [5 ,6 ]
Houlind, Kim [2 ,7 ]
Konge, Lars [3 ,8 ]
Bjerrum, Flemming [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark DK, Hosp Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Vasc Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Surg Sect, Gastrounit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
appendectomy; assessment; colorectal surgery; competency; education; simulation; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SURGICAL SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16905
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThere is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.MethodA systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.ResultsFifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery
    Mirnezami, A. H.
    Mirnezami, R.
    Venkatasubramaniam, A. K.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Cecil, T. D.
    Moran, B. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (11) : 1084 - 1093
  • [22] The learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review
    Flynn, Julie
    Larach, Jose Tomas
    Kong, Joseph C. H.
    Waters, Peadar S.
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Heriot, Alexander
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (11) : 2806 - 2820
  • [23] A Systematic Review of Wellness in Plastic Surgery Training
    Grome, Luke J.
    Reul, Ross M.
    Agrawal, Nikhil
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Winocour, Sebastian
    Buchanan, Edward P.
    Maricevich, Renata S.
    Reece, Edward M.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2021, 41 (08) : 969 - 977
  • [24] Simulation training in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Rasmus Christian Rasmussen
    Jakob Grauslund
    Anna Stage Vergmann
    BMC Ophthalmology, 19
  • [25] Simulation training in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Rasmussen, Rasmus Christian
    Grauslund, Jakob
    Vergmann, Anna Stage
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [26] Evaluation of Procedural Simulation as a Training and Assessment Tool in General Surgery Simulating a Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    Strandbygaard, Jeanett
    Rosthoj, Susanne
    Grantcharov, Teoclor
    Ottesen, Bent
    Sorensen, Jette Led
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [27] The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Tyler McKechnie
    Jigish Khamar
    Ryan Daniel
    Yung Lee
    Lily Park
    Aristithes G. Doumouras
    Dennis Hong
    Mohit Bhandari
    Cagla Eskicioglu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 325 - 334
  • [28] Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review
    Simmonds, P
    Best, L
    Baughan, C
    Buchanan, R
    Davis, C
    Fentiman, I
    George, S
    Gosney, M
    Northover, J
    Williams, C
    Amato, A
    Arbman, G
    Arenal, JJ
    Barillari, P
    Benhamiche-Bouvier, AM
    Bjerkeset, T
    Braun, L
    Carlsen, E
    Coco, C
    Fielding, LP
    Franklin, ME
    Hermanek, P
    de la Fuente, FH
    Hohenberger, W
    Kingston, RD
    Komborozos, VA
    Lau, WY
    Marks, CG
    Navarro-Pomares, A
    Pigot, F
    Carraro, PS
    Smith, J
    Stamatakis, JD
    Sugihara, K
    Tagliacozzo, S
    Tartter, P
    Verschueren, RCJ
    Violi, V
    LANCET, 2000, 356 (9234): : 968 - 974
  • [29] Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in older people: a systematic review
    Hewitt, J.
    Clarke, R.
    Coode-Bate, J.
    McCarthy, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 : 178 - 178
  • [30] Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review
    Zi Qin Ng
    Patrick Tan
    Mary Theophilus
    World Journal of Surgery, 2023, 47 : 2519 - 2531