Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hertz, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Rattenborg, Soren [2 ,4 ]
Haug, Tora R. [5 ,6 ]
Houlind, Kim [2 ,7 ]
Konge, Lars [3 ,8 ]
Bjerrum, Flemming [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark DK, Hosp Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Vasc Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Surg Sect, Gastrounit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
appendectomy; assessment; colorectal surgery; competency; education; simulation; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SURGICAL SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16905
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThere is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.MethodA systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.ResultsFifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Cauley, Christy E.
    Samost-Williams, Aubrey
    Philpotts, Lisa
    Brindle, Mary
    Cooper, Zara
    Ritchie, Christine S.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 296 : 720 - 734
  • [2] Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments
    van Zwieten, Tom
    Okkema, Sietske
    van Det, Marc
    Pereboom, Ilona
    Veeger, Nic
    Pierie, Jean-Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [3] Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments
    Tom van Zwieten
    Sietske Okkema
    Marc van Det
    Ilona Pereboom
    Nic Veeger
    Jean-Pierre Pierie
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [4] Simulation Based Training and Assessment in Open Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Lawaetz, Jonathan
    Kristensen, Joachim S. Skovbo
    Nayahangan, Leizl J.
    Van Herzeele, Isabelle
    Konge, Lars
    Eiberg, Jonas P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 61 (03) : 502 - 509
  • [5] ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS FOR APPENDECTOMY AND COLORECTAL SURGERY
    GORBACH, SL
    REVIEWS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1991, 13 : S815 - S820
  • [6] Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review
    Bessoff, Kovi E.
    Choi, Jeff
    Wolff, Christopher J.
    Kashikar, Aditi
    Carlos, Garrison M.
    Caddell, Luke
    Khan, Rida, I
    Stave, Christopher D.
    Spain, David A.
    Forrester, Joseph D.
    SURGERY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 6 : 29 - 39
  • [7] Risk of colorectal cancer after appendectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Zhuhui
    Ma, Xinyue
    Zhu, Chunqi
    Fang, Jing-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 350 - 358
  • [8] The association of appendectomy and colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis patients: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Stellingwerf, M. E.
    de Koning, M. A.
    Bemelman, W. A.
    D'Haens, G. R.
    Buskens, C. J.
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2018, 12 : S85 - S86
  • [9] Role of appendectomy in training for laparoscopic surgery
    M. Carrasco-Prats
    V. Soria Aledo
    J.A. Luján-Mompeán
    A. Ríos-Zambudio
    D. Pérez-Flores
    P. Parrilla-Paricio
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, 17 : 111 - 114
  • [10] VR application for appendectomy surgery training
    Bahashwan, Kholoud
    Alnasser, Shahad
    Kurdi, Rabea F.
    Test Engineering and Management, 2019, 81 (11-12): : 4121 - 4125