Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTRACORPOREAL VERSUS EXTRACORPOREAL ANASTOMOSIS IN LAPAROSCOPIC RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Oliveira, D.
    Luque, A.
    Oliveira, F. M.
    Junqueira Junior, S. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A871 - A871
  • [42] Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Qingbin
    Jin, Chengwu
    Hu, Tao
    Wei, Mingtian
    Wang, Ziqiang
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (04): : 348 - 357
  • [43] Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Jian-Chun
    Zhao, Shuai
    Chen, Wei
    Wu, Jian-Xiang
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2023, 18 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [44] Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right colectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Boye
    Luo, Zuyang
    Lu, Jiabao
    Yang, Yang
    Song, Yixian
    Cao, Jie
    Li, Wanglin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 55 : 31 - 38
  • [45] Letter to the Editor: Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Peravali, Rajeev
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (07) : 2445 - 2446
  • [46] Letter to the Editor: Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shahin Hajibandeh
    Shahab Hajibandeh
    Rajeev Peravali
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 2445 - 2446
  • [47] Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernias in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Olesen, Christoffer Skov
    Andresen, Kristoffer
    Oberg, Stina
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2050 - 2060
  • [48] Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sattari, Shahab Aldin
    Sattari, Ali Reza
    Makary, Martin A.
    Hu, Chen
    He, Jin
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (05) : 742 - 755
  • [49] Laparoscopic versus open repair of congenital duodenal obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jie Zhang
    Xiaoqi Xu
    Xiaoman Wang
    Lingling Zhao
    Yaxin Lv
    Kuai Chen
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2022, 38 : 1507 - 1515
  • [50] Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis
    Paschalis Gavriilidis
    R. Justin Davies
    Antonio Biondi
    James Wheeler
    Mario Testini
    Giulio Carcano
    Salomone Di Saverio
    Updates in Surgery, 2020, 72 : 639 - 648