Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic versus open treatment of gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Xiang Yang
    Ji, Wu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [32] Assessment of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lyu, Yunxiao
    Cheng, Yunxiao
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Sicong
    Chen, Liang
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 31 (03) : 350 - 358
  • [33] Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yingjia
    Liu, Chunxi
    Nistala, Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu
    Chong, Choon Seng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (12) : 2421 - 2430
  • [34] Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric StenosisdA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lunger, Fabian
    Staerkle, Ralph F.
    Muff, Julian L.
    Fink, Lukas
    Holland-Cunz, Stefan G.
    Vuille-dit-Bille, Raphael N.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 274 : 1 - 8
  • [35] Laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ru, Wei
    Wu, Peng
    Feng, Shaoguang
    Lai, Xin-He
    Chen, Guorong
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (10) : 1731 - 1736
  • [36] Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review by an Updated Meta-Analysis
    Paschalis Gavriilidis
    Christian Camenzuli
    Anna Paspala
    Aimee N. Di Marco
    Fausto F. Palazzo
    World Journal of Surgery, 2021, 45 : 168 - 179
  • [37] Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review by an Updated Meta-Analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Camenzuli, Christian
    Paspala, Anna
    Di Marco, Aimee N.
    Palazzo, Fausto F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (01) : 168 - 179
  • [38] Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Rhu, J.
    Choi, G. S.
    Kim, J. M.
    Kwon, C. H. D.
    Kim, S. J.
    Joh, J. -W.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 108 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [39] Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic partial anterior fundoplication versus laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication
    Ahmed, Zuhair
    Murphy, Thomas
    Fahey, Tom
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 68 - 68
  • [40] Comparison of Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nouralizadeh, Akbar
    Tabatabaei, Shahin
    Basiri, Abbas
    Simforoosh, Nasser
    Soleimani, Mohammad
    Javanmard, Babak
    Ansari, Anahita
    Shemshaki, Hamidreza
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (06): : 656 - 681