Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Evangeliou, Alexandros P.
    Mylonas, Konstantinos S.
    Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I.
    Cherouveim, Panagiotis
    Geller, David A.
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Alexopoulos, Sophoclis P.
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 22 (04): : 585 - 604
  • [22] Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ioannis A. Ziogas
    Alexandros P. Evangeliou
    Konstantinos S. Mylonas
    Dimitrios I. Athanasiadis
    Panagiotis Cherouveim
    David A. Geller
    Richard D. Schulick
    Sophoclis P. Alexopoulos
    Georgios Tsoulfas
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2021, 22 : 585 - 604
  • [23] Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Solaini, Leonardo
    Bazzocchi, Francesca
    Cavaliere, Davide
    Avanzolini, Andrea
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03): : 1104 - 1110
  • [24] Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leonardo Solaini
    Francesca Bazzocchi
    Davide Cavaliere
    Andrea Avanzolini
    Alessandro Cucchetti
    Giorgio Ercolani
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 1104 - 1110
  • [25] Laparoscopic versus open loop ileostomy reversal: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mckechnie, Tyler
    Tessier, Tea
    Anpalagan, Tharani
    Chu, Megan
    Lee, Yung
    Logie, Kathleen
    Doumouras, Aristithes
    Amin, Nalin
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2023, 13
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann’s reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valerio Celentano
    Mariano Cesare Giglio
    Luigi Bucci
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2015, 30 : 1603 - 1615
  • [27] Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zeng, Qi
    Aierken, Amina
    Gu, Shen-Sen
    Yao, Gang
    Apaer, Shadike
    Anweier, Nuerzhatijiang
    Wu, Jing
    Zhao, Jin-Ming
    Li, Tao
    Tuxun, Tuerhongjiang
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (05): : 637 - 644
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colonoscopic perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhong, Wu
    Liu, Chuanyuan
    Fang, Chuanfa
    Zhang, Lei
    He, Xianping
    Zhu, Weiquan
    Guan, Xueyun
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (24) : E34057
  • [29] Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Celentano, Valerio
    Giglio, Mariano Cesare
    Bucci, Luigi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (12) : 1603 - 1615
  • [30] Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yingjia Zhang
    Chunxi Liu
    Kameswara Rishi Yeshayahu Nistala
    Choon Seng Chong
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2022, 37 : 2421 - 2430