Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Zigang [1 ]
Fang, Hongcai [1 ]
Huang, Mingwen [2 ]
Yu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 57 Xunyang East Rd, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic; Hepatectomy; Right posterior sectionectomy; Meta-analysis; LEFT LATERAL SECTIONECTOMY; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER RESECTION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; OPEN HEPATECTOMY; TUMORS; SEGMENTS; FEASIBILITY; OUTCOMES; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).ConclusionsLRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zigang Ding
    Hongcai Fang
    Mingwen Huang
    Tao Yu
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [2] The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs. open approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Meng-Xiao
    Xiang, Ji-Feng
    Chen, Sheng-Kai
    Xiao, Lin-Kang
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [3] Robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Qayum, Mohammed Kaif
    Dosis, Alexios
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [4] A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy
    Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
    Tasiopoulou, Vasiliki S.
    Svokos, Konstantina A.
    Svokos, Alexis A.
    Christodoulidis, Gregory
    Mamaloudis, Ioannis
    Sioka, Eleni
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    HPB, 2018, 20 (12) : 1130 - 1136
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cirocchi, R.
    Campanile, F. Cesare
    Di Saverio, S.
    Popivanov, G.
    Carlini, L.
    Pironi, D.
    Tabola, R.
    Vettoretto, N.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2017, 154 (06) : 387 - 399
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Negin Sedaghat
    Amy M. Cao
    Guy D. Eslick
    Michael R. Cox
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 673 - 679
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chethan Sathya
    Carolyn Wayne
    Anna Gotsch
    Jennifer Vincent
    Katrina J. Sullivan
    Ahmed Nasr
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2017, 33 : 325 - 333
  • [8] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy
    Cheng, Qiuye
    Pang, Tony C. Y.
    Hollands, Michael J.
    Richardson, Arthur J.
    Pleass, Henry
    Johnston, Emma S.
    Lam, Vincent W. T.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (06) : 1087 - 1099
  • [9] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sedaghat, Negin
    Cao, Amy M.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Cox, Michael R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (02): : 673 - 679
  • [10] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy
    Qiuye Cheng
    Tony C. Y. Pang
    Michael J. Hollands
    Arthur J. Richardson
    Henry Pleass
    Emma S. Johnston
    Vincent W. T. Lam
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2014, 18 : 1087 - 1099