Tumor localization by Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 predicts prognosis of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:5
|
作者
Fujimoto, Ayumi [1 ]
Sakamoto, Shinichi [1 ]
Horikoshi, Takuro [2 ]
Zhao, Xue [1 ]
Yamada, Yasutaka [1 ]
Rii, Junryo [1 ]
Takeuchi, Nobuyoshi [1 ]
Imamura, Yusuke [1 ]
Sazuka, Tomokazu [1 ]
Matsusaka, Keisuke [3 ]
Ikeda, Jun-ichiro [4 ]
Ichikawa, Tomohiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo ku, Chiba, Chiba 2608670, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Grad Sch Med, Chiba 2608670, Japan
关键词
PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; RISK-FACTORS; PROGRESSION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-36685-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An improved reading agreement rate has been reported in version 2.1 (v2.1) of the Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) compared with earlier versions. To determine the predictive efficacy of bi-parametric MRI (bp-MRI) for biochemical recurrence (BCR), our study assessed PI-RADS v2.1 score and tumor location in Japanese prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 299 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Chiba University Hospital between 2006 and 2018. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before surgery was 7.6 ng/mL. Preoperative PI-RADS v2.1 categories were 1-2, 3, 4, and 5 in 35, 56, 138, and 70 patients, respectively. Tumor location on preoperative MRI was 107 in the transition zone (TZ) and 192 in the peripheral zone (PZ). BCR-free survival was significantly shorter in the PZ group (p = 0.001). In the total prostatectomy specimens, preoperative PI-RADS category 5, radiological tumor location, pathological seminal vesicle invasion, and Grade Group & GE; 3 were independent prognostic factors of BCR. These four risk factors have significant potential to stratify patients and predict prognosis. Radiological tumor location and PI-RADS v2.1 category using bp-MRI may enable prediction of BCR following radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Turkbey, Baris
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Villeirs, Geert
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Cornud, Francois
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) : 340 - 351
  • [32] The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting
    Volz, Yannic
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Pyrgidis, Nikolaos
    Pfitzinger, Paulo L.
    Berg, Elena
    Ebner, Benedikt
    Enzinger, Benazir
    Ivanova, Troya
    Atzler, Michael
    Kazmierczak, Philipp M.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Stief, Christian
    Chaloupka, Michael
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (16)
  • [33] PI-RADS 2.0 for Recurrence Prognosis after radical Prostatectomy
    Heberer, Bettina
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2017, 48 (05) : 414 - 414
  • [34] Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Oh, Young Taik
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Hong, Sung Joon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (08) : 2502 - 2509
  • [35] Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results
    Sung Yoon Park
    Young Taik Oh
    Dae Chul Jung
    Nam Hoon Cho
    Young Deuk Choi
    Koon Ho Rha
    Sung Joon Hong
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 2502 - 2509
  • [36] IMPACT OF THE PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2 (PI-RADS V2) ON THE ASSESSMENT OF EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION IN PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTIREADER STUDY
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Inoue, Masaharu
    Ito, Masaya
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Numao, Noboru
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E988 - E988
  • [37] Can you trust the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in special cases?
    Valentin, Birte
    Blondin, Dirk
    Ullrich, Tim
    Arsov, Christian
    Ackermann, Maximilian
    Antoch, Gerald
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2020, 192 (06): : 580 - 583
  • [38] Perspectives on technology: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) interobserver variability
    Taya, Michio
    Behr, Spencer C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (04) : 510 - 518
  • [39] Interobserver agreement of Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS–v2)
    Hala Maher Ahmed
    Ahmed Ebrahim Ebeed
    Ahmed Hamdy
    Mohamed Abou El-Ghar
    Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [40] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in prostate cancer staging and planning for radical prostatectomy
    Kozikowski, Mieszko
    Zagozdzon, Barttomiej
    Gola, Magdalena
    Dobruch, Jakub
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2019, 14 (02) : 262 - 270