Tumor localization by Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 predicts prognosis of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:5
|
作者
Fujimoto, Ayumi [1 ]
Sakamoto, Shinichi [1 ]
Horikoshi, Takuro [2 ]
Zhao, Xue [1 ]
Yamada, Yasutaka [1 ]
Rii, Junryo [1 ]
Takeuchi, Nobuyoshi [1 ]
Imamura, Yusuke [1 ]
Sazuka, Tomokazu [1 ]
Matsusaka, Keisuke [3 ]
Ikeda, Jun-ichiro [4 ]
Ichikawa, Tomohiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo ku, Chiba, Chiba 2608670, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Grad Sch Med, Chiba 2608670, Japan
关键词
PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; RISK-FACTORS; PROGRESSION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-36685-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An improved reading agreement rate has been reported in version 2.1 (v2.1) of the Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) compared with earlier versions. To determine the predictive efficacy of bi-parametric MRI (bp-MRI) for biochemical recurrence (BCR), our study assessed PI-RADS v2.1 score and tumor location in Japanese prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 299 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Chiba University Hospital between 2006 and 2018. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before surgery was 7.6 ng/mL. Preoperative PI-RADS v2.1 categories were 1-2, 3, 4, and 5 in 35, 56, 138, and 70 patients, respectively. Tumor location on preoperative MRI was 107 in the transition zone (TZ) and 192 in the peripheral zone (PZ). BCR-free survival was significantly shorter in the PZ group (p = 0.001). In the total prostatectomy specimens, preoperative PI-RADS category 5, radiological tumor location, pathological seminal vesicle invasion, and Grade Group & GE; 3 were independent prognostic factors of BCR. These four risk factors have significant potential to stratify patients and predict prognosis. Radiological tumor location and PI-RADS v2.1 category using bp-MRI may enable prediction of BCR following radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review
    Hassanzadeh, Elmira
    Glazer, Daniel I.
    Dunne, Ruth M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (01) : 278 - 289
  • [22] Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review
    Elmira Hassanzadeh
    Daniel I. Glazer
    Ruth M. Dunne
    Fiona M. Fennessy
    Mukesh G. Harisinghani
    Clare M. Tempany
    Abdominal Radiology, 2017, 42 : 278 - 289
  • [23] Accuracy of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS v2) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa).
    Gill, David Michael
    Bishoff, Jay
    Lynch, Steven C.
    Foy, Bridget
    Evans, Jaden D.
    Haslem, Derrick S.
    Yeatman, Timothy Joseph
    McLean, Logan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [24] COMBINATION OF VERSION 2.0 PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) AND PERIPROSTATIC FAT THICKNESS ON MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI TO PREDICT THE PRESENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Cao, Yudong
    Cao, Min
    Chen, Yuke
    Yu, Wei
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Jin, Jie
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E819 - E819
  • [25] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS): What the radiologists need to know?
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    El-Diasty, Tarek
    Elhendy, Ahmed
    Fahmy, Dalia
    EL-Adalany, Mohamed Ali
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 79 : 183 - 200
  • [26] PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI
    Barrett, T.
    Rajesh, A.
    Rosenkrantz, A. B.
    Choyke, P. L.
    Turkbey, B.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (11) : 841 - 852
  • [27] Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer
    Lili Xu
    Gumuyang Zhang
    Daming Zhang
    Xiaoxiao Zhang
    Xin Bai
    Weigang Yan
    Yi Zhou
    Zhien Zhou
    Yu Xiao
    Zhengyu Jin
    Hao Sun
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 4133 - 4141
  • [28] Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer
    Xu, Lili
    Zhang, Gumuyang
    Zhang, Daming
    Zhang, Xiaoxiao
    Bai, Xin
    Yan, Weigang
    Zhou, Yi
    Zhou, Zhien
    Xiao, Yu
    Jin, Zhengyu
    Sun, Hao
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 4133 - 4141
  • [29] Diagnostic accuracy of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) magnetic resonance score by assessing correlation to radical prostatectomy pathology findings
    Guirgis, M.
    Baskaranathan, S.
    Hockings, A.
    Lee, S.
    Cohen, R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 40 - 41
  • [30] ROLE OF PI-RADS VERSION 2 FOR PREDICTION OF INCIDENTAL PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL CYSTOPROSTATECTOMY
    Song, Wan
    Jeong, Jae Yong
    Kim, Tae Heon
    Yoon, Hyun Suk
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Yoon, Hana
    Chung, Woo Sik
    Sim, Bong Suk
    Lee, Dong Hyeon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E178 - E179