Tumor localization by Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 predicts prognosis of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:5
|
作者
Fujimoto, Ayumi [1 ]
Sakamoto, Shinichi [1 ]
Horikoshi, Takuro [2 ]
Zhao, Xue [1 ]
Yamada, Yasutaka [1 ]
Rii, Junryo [1 ]
Takeuchi, Nobuyoshi [1 ]
Imamura, Yusuke [1 ]
Sazuka, Tomokazu [1 ]
Matsusaka, Keisuke [3 ]
Ikeda, Jun-ichiro [4 ]
Ichikawa, Tomohiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo ku, Chiba, Chiba 2608670, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[3] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Grad Sch Med, Chiba 2608670, Japan
关键词
PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; RISK-FACTORS; PROGRESSION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-36685-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An improved reading agreement rate has been reported in version 2.1 (v2.1) of the Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) compared with earlier versions. To determine the predictive efficacy of bi-parametric MRI (bp-MRI) for biochemical recurrence (BCR), our study assessed PI-RADS v2.1 score and tumor location in Japanese prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 299 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Chiba University Hospital between 2006 and 2018. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level before surgery was 7.6 ng/mL. Preoperative PI-RADS v2.1 categories were 1-2, 3, 4, and 5 in 35, 56, 138, and 70 patients, respectively. Tumor location on preoperative MRI was 107 in the transition zone (TZ) and 192 in the peripheral zone (PZ). BCR-free survival was significantly shorter in the PZ group (p = 0.001). In the total prostatectomy specimens, preoperative PI-RADS category 5, radiological tumor location, pathological seminal vesicle invasion, and Grade Group & GE; 3 were independent prognostic factors of BCR. These four risk factors have significant potential to stratify patients and predict prognosis. Radiological tumor location and PI-RADS v2.1 category using bp-MRI may enable prediction of BCR following radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tumor localization by Prostate Imaging and Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 predicts prognosis of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Ayumi Fujimoto
    Shinichi Sakamoto
    Takuro Horikoshi
    Xue Zhao
    Yasutaka Yamada
    Junryo Rii
    Nobuyoshi Takeuchi
    Yusuke Imamura
    Tomokazu Sazuka
    Keisuke Matsusaka
    Jun-ichiro Ikeda
    Tomohiko Ichikawa
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Cornud, Francois
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Shtern, Faina
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Verma, Sadna
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 16 - 40
  • [3] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Turkbey, Baris
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (06) : 1179 - 1183
  • [4] Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
    Tewes, Susanne
    Mokov, Nikolaj
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Schick, Volker
    Peters, Inga
    Schedl, Peter
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Wacker, Frank
    Voshage, Goetz
    Hueper, Katja
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [5] Prospective evaluation of multiparametric MRI of prostate and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2 for prostate cancer detection
    Lim, L. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 22 - 23
  • [6] Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Kido, Ayumu
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Miyaji, Yoshiyuki
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Sone, Teruki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 121
  • [7] PI-RADS 2.1 and structured reporting of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate
    Hoetker, Andreas
    Donati, Olivio F.
    RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (09): : 802 - 809
  • [8] Interreader agreement with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer in MRI/TRUS software fusion prostate biopsy
    Kim, J.
    Song, W. H.
    Lee, D. D.
    Lee, S. S.
    Nam, J. K.
    Ryu, H. S.
    Kim, T. U.
    Park, S. W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S722 - S723
  • [9] Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)
    Meier-Schroers, Michael
    Kukuk, Guido
    Wolter, Karsten
    Decker, Georges
    Fischer, Stefan
    Marx, Christian
    Traeber, Frank
    Sprinkart, Alois Martin
    Block, Wolfgang
    Schild, Hans Heinz
    Willinek, Winfried
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (07) : 1304 - 1311
  • [10] Prostate Cancer Localization Using Multiparametric MR Imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert Scales
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Kim, Sooah
    Lim, Ruth P.
    Hindman, Nicole
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Babb, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) : 481 - 491