Public health impact and return on investment of Belgium's pediatric immunization program

被引:6
|
作者
Carrico, Justin [1 ]
Mellott, Claire E. [1 ]
Talbird, Sandra E. [1 ]
Bento-Abreu, Andre [2 ]
Merckx, Barbara [2 ]
Vandenhaute, Jessica [2 ]
Benchabane, Damia [2 ]
Dauby, Nicolas [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ethgen, Olivier [6 ,7 ]
Lepage, Philippe [8 ,9 ]
Luyten, Jeroen [10 ]
Raes, Marc [11 ]
Simoens, Steven
Van Ranst, Marc
Eiden, Amanda
Nyaku, Mawuli K.
Bencina, Goran
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] MSD, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Ctr Hosp Univ St Pierre, Dept Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[4] ULB, Sch Publ Hlth, Brussels, Belgium
[5] ULB, Inst Med Immunol, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Liege, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Liege, Belgium
[7] SERFAN Innovat, Namur, Belgium
[8] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Paediat Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[9] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[10] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Inst Healthcare Policy, Leuven, Belgium
[11] Jessa Hosp, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
vaccination; model; cost-benefit analysis; national immunization program; expanded immunization program; infectious disease; VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; UNITED-STATES; HEPATITIS-C; PREVALENCE; COST;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1032385
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveWe evaluated the public health impact and return on investment of Belgium's pediatric immunization program (PIP) from both healthcare-sector and societal perspectives. MethodsWe developed a decision analytic model for 6 vaccines routinely administered in Belgium for children aged 0-10 years: DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib, DTaP-IPV, MMR, PCV, rotavirus, and meningococcal type C. We used separate decision trees to model each of the 11 vaccine-preventable pathogens: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, and meningococcal type C; hepatitis B was excluded because of surveillance limitations. The 2018 birth cohort was followed over its lifetime. The model projected and compared health outcomes and costs with and without immunization (based on vaccine-era and pre-vaccine era disease incidence estimates, respectively), assuming that observed reductions in disease incidence were fully attributable to vaccination. For the societal perspective, the model included productivity loss costs associated with immunization and disease in addition to direct medical costs. The model estimated discounted cases averted, disease-related deaths averted, life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years gained, costs (2020 euros), and an overall benefit-cost ratio. Scenario analyses considered alternate assumptions for key model inputs. ResultsAcross all 11 pathogens, we estimated that the PIP prevented 226,000 cases of infections and 200 deaths, as well as the loss of 7,000 life-years and 8,000 quality-adjusted life-years over the lifetime of a birth cohort of 118,000 children. The PIP was associated with discounted vaccination costs of euro91 million from the healthcare-sector perspective and euro122 million from the societal perspective. However, vaccination costs were more than fully offset by disease-related costs averted, with the latter amounting to a discounted euro126 million and euro390 million from the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives, respectively. As a result, pediatric immunization was associated with overall discounted savings of euro35 million and euro268 million from the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives, respectively; every euro1 invested in childhood immunization resulted in approximately euro1.4 in disease-related cost savings to the health system and euro3.2 in cost savings from a societal perspective for Belgium's PIP. Estimates of the value of the PIP were most sensitive to changes in input assumptions for disease incidence, productivity losses due to disease-related mortality, and direct medical disease costs. ConclusionBelgium's PIP, which previously had not been systematically assessed, provides large-scale prevention of disease-related morbidity and premature mortality, and is associated with net savings to health system and society. Continued investment in the PIP is warranted to sustain its positive public health and financial impact.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating return on investment in a school based health promotion and prevention program: The investment multiplier for the Stephanie Alexander Kitchen Garden National Program
    Eckermann, Simon
    Dawber, James
    Yeatman, Heather
    Quinsey, Karen
    Morris, Darcy
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2014, 114 : 103 - 112
  • [42] Integrated Health Programs, Health Outcomes, and Return on Investment Measuring Workplace Health Promotion and Integrated Program Effectiveness
    Cherniack, Martin
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2013, 55 (12) : S38 - S45
  • [43] HRSA's Investment in Public Health Training Centers
    Russell, Sophia
    Jung, Paul
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (05): : S197 - S198
  • [44] An Empirical Analysis in the Impact of Public Health Investment on Economic Growth
    Wang Li
    STATISTIC APPLICATION IN MACROECONOMY AND INDUSTRY SECTORS, 2010, : 710 - 715
  • [45] Systems Science: A Good Investment for the Public's Health
    Mabry, Patricia L.
    Kaplan, Robert M.
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 40 : 9S - 12S
  • [46] Lessons Learned From Measuring Return on Investment in Public Health Quality Improvement Initiatives
    Crawley-Stout, Lou Anne
    Ward, Kerri Ann
    See, Claire Herring
    Randolph, Greg
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (02): : E28 - E37
  • [47] Analyses of the return on investment of public health interventions: a scoping review and recommendations for future studies
    Turner, Hugo C.
    Hori, Yoshiaki
    Revill, Paul
    Rattanavipapong, Waranya
    Arai, Ko
    Nonvignon, Justice
    Jit, Mark
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 8 (08):
  • [48] Adding value to the use of Health Impact Assessment and social return on investment technologies
    Green, L.
    Ashton, K.
    Dyakova, M.
    Parry-Williams, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [49] Role of health communications in Russia's diphtheria immunization program
    Porter, RW
    Steinglass, R
    Kaiser, J
    Olkhovsky, P
    Rasmuson, M
    Dzhatdoeva, FA
    Fishman, B
    Bragina, V
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 181 : S220 - S227
  • [50] The Public Health Impact of Pediatric Caustic Ingestion Injuries
    Johnson, Christopher M.
    Brigger, Matthew T.
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2012, 138 (12) : 1111 - 1115