Public health impact and return on investment of Belgium's pediatric immunization program

被引:6
|
作者
Carrico, Justin [1 ]
Mellott, Claire E. [1 ]
Talbird, Sandra E. [1 ]
Bento-Abreu, Andre [2 ]
Merckx, Barbara [2 ]
Vandenhaute, Jessica [2 ]
Benchabane, Damia [2 ]
Dauby, Nicolas [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ethgen, Olivier [6 ,7 ]
Lepage, Philippe [8 ,9 ]
Luyten, Jeroen [10 ]
Raes, Marc [11 ]
Simoens, Steven
Van Ranst, Marc
Eiden, Amanda
Nyaku, Mawuli K.
Bencina, Goran
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] MSD, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Ctr Hosp Univ St Pierre, Dept Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[4] ULB, Sch Publ Hlth, Brussels, Belgium
[5] ULB, Inst Med Immunol, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Liege, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Liege, Belgium
[7] SERFAN Innovat, Namur, Belgium
[8] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Paediat Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[9] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[10] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Inst Healthcare Policy, Leuven, Belgium
[11] Jessa Hosp, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
vaccination; model; cost-benefit analysis; national immunization program; expanded immunization program; infectious disease; VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; UNITED-STATES; HEPATITIS-C; PREVALENCE; COST;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1032385
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveWe evaluated the public health impact and return on investment of Belgium's pediatric immunization program (PIP) from both healthcare-sector and societal perspectives. MethodsWe developed a decision analytic model for 6 vaccines routinely administered in Belgium for children aged 0-10 years: DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib, DTaP-IPV, MMR, PCV, rotavirus, and meningococcal type C. We used separate decision trees to model each of the 11 vaccine-preventable pathogens: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, and meningococcal type C; hepatitis B was excluded because of surveillance limitations. The 2018 birth cohort was followed over its lifetime. The model projected and compared health outcomes and costs with and without immunization (based on vaccine-era and pre-vaccine era disease incidence estimates, respectively), assuming that observed reductions in disease incidence were fully attributable to vaccination. For the societal perspective, the model included productivity loss costs associated with immunization and disease in addition to direct medical costs. The model estimated discounted cases averted, disease-related deaths averted, life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years gained, costs (2020 euros), and an overall benefit-cost ratio. Scenario analyses considered alternate assumptions for key model inputs. ResultsAcross all 11 pathogens, we estimated that the PIP prevented 226,000 cases of infections and 200 deaths, as well as the loss of 7,000 life-years and 8,000 quality-adjusted life-years over the lifetime of a birth cohort of 118,000 children. The PIP was associated with discounted vaccination costs of euro91 million from the healthcare-sector perspective and euro122 million from the societal perspective. However, vaccination costs were more than fully offset by disease-related costs averted, with the latter amounting to a discounted euro126 million and euro390 million from the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives, respectively. As a result, pediatric immunization was associated with overall discounted savings of euro35 million and euro268 million from the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives, respectively; every euro1 invested in childhood immunization resulted in approximately euro1.4 in disease-related cost savings to the health system and euro3.2 in cost savings from a societal perspective for Belgium's PIP. Estimates of the value of the PIP were most sensitive to changes in input assumptions for disease incidence, productivity losses due to disease-related mortality, and direct medical disease costs. ConclusionBelgium's PIP, which previously had not been systematically assessed, provides large-scale prevention of disease-related morbidity and premature mortality, and is associated with net savings to health system and society. Continued investment in the PIP is warranted to sustain its positive public health and financial impact.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Female Characters on Movie's Return on Investment
    Lakhotia, Raghav
    Ganu, Sameer
    Goel, Anshul
    Kumar, Abhishek
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WOMEN & GENDER STUDIES 2018, 2018, : 73 - 79
  • [22] A Return-on-Investment Analysis of the Health Promotion Program At the University of Minnesota
    Nyman, John A.
    Barleen, Nathan A.
    Dowd, Bryan E.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 51 (01) : 54 - 65
  • [23] ESTIMATING CHANGES IN LIFETIME TAX REVENUE AND TRANSFER PAYMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PEDIATRIC IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM IN BELGIUM
    Kotsopoulos, N.
    Connolly, M.
    Bento-Abreu, A.
    Bencina, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S136 - S136
  • [24] Economic Impact and Return on Public Investment of a Book Fair and Cultural Festival
    Segre, Giovanna
    Morelli, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (02) : 52 - 61
  • [25] The Bard's Birthday, Immunization, and Public Health
    Binns, Colin
    Low, Wah-Yun
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 26 (04) : 336 - 338
  • [26] SOCIAL RATE OF RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 1880-1910
    MEEKER, E
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1974, 34 (02): : 392 - 421
  • [27] Capturing the social value and return on investment of public health services and interventions
    Ashton, K.
    Stielke, A.
    Dyakova, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29
  • [28] Application of a return of investment analysis for public health training by case study
    Matthews, Sarah D.
    Jackson, Jennifer T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2021, 49 (12) : 1522 - 1527
  • [29] Impact of Incidental Lung Nodule Program on Early Cancer Detection and Return on Investment
    Bechara, R. I.
    Singh, J.
    Bellinger, C. R.
    Lackey, L.
    Doty, J. D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [30] EXTERNALITIES IN PROGRAM EVALUATION: THE IMPACT OF A WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM ON IMMUNIZATION
    Janssens, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, 9 (06) : 1082 - 1113