Public health impact and return on investment of Belgium's pediatric immunization program

被引:6
|
作者
Carrico, Justin [1 ]
Mellott, Claire E. [1 ]
Talbird, Sandra E. [1 ]
Bento-Abreu, Andre [2 ]
Merckx, Barbara [2 ]
Vandenhaute, Jessica [2 ]
Benchabane, Damia [2 ]
Dauby, Nicolas [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ethgen, Olivier [6 ,7 ]
Lepage, Philippe [8 ,9 ]
Luyten, Jeroen [10 ]
Raes, Marc [11 ]
Simoens, Steven
Van Ranst, Marc
Eiden, Amanda
Nyaku, Mawuli K.
Bencina, Goran
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] MSD, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Ctr Hosp Univ St Pierre, Dept Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[4] ULB, Sch Publ Hlth, Brussels, Belgium
[5] ULB, Inst Med Immunol, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Liege, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Liege, Belgium
[7] SERFAN Innovat, Namur, Belgium
[8] Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Paediat Infect Dis, Brussels, Belgium
[9] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[10] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven Inst Healthcare Policy, Leuven, Belgium
[11] Jessa Hosp, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
vaccination; model; cost-benefit analysis; national immunization program; expanded immunization program; infectious disease; VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES; MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; UNITED-STATES; HEPATITIS-C; PREVALENCE; COST;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1032385
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveWe evaluated the public health impact and return on investment of Belgium's pediatric immunization program (PIP) from both healthcare-sector and societal perspectives. MethodsWe developed a decision analytic model for 6 vaccines routinely administered in Belgium for children aged 0-10 years: DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib, DTaP-IPV, MMR, PCV, rotavirus, and meningococcal type C. We used separate decision trees to model each of the 11 vaccine-preventable pathogens: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, and meningococcal type C; hepatitis B was excluded because of surveillance limitations. The 2018 birth cohort was followed over its lifetime. The model projected and compared health outcomes and costs with and without immunization (based on vaccine-era and pre-vaccine era disease incidence estimates, respectively), assuming that observed reductions in disease incidence were fully attributable to vaccination. For the societal perspective, the model included productivity loss costs associated with immunization and disease in addition to direct medical costs. The model estimated discounted cases averted, disease-related deaths averted, life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years gained, costs (2020 euros), and an overall benefit-cost ratio. Scenario analyses considered alternate assumptions for key model inputs. ResultsAcross all 11 pathogens, we estimated that the PIP prevented 226,000 cases of infections and 200 deaths, as well as the loss of 7,000 life-years and 8,000 quality-adjusted life-years over the lifetime of a birth cohort of 118,000 children. The PIP was associated with discounted vaccination costs of euro91 million from the healthcare-sector perspective and euro122 million from the societal perspective. However, vaccination costs were more than fully offset by disease-related costs averted, with the latter amounting to a discounted euro126 million and euro390 million from the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives, respectively. As a result, pediatric immunization was associated with overall discounted savings of euro35 million and euro268 million from the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives, respectively; every euro1 invested in childhood immunization resulted in approximately euro1.4 in disease-related cost savings to the health system and euro3.2 in cost savings from a societal perspective for Belgium's PIP. Estimates of the value of the PIP were most sensitive to changes in input assumptions for disease incidence, productivity losses due to disease-related mortality, and direct medical disease costs. ConclusionBelgium's PIP, which previously had not been systematically assessed, provides large-scale prevention of disease-related morbidity and premature mortality, and is associated with net savings to health system and society. Continued investment in the PIP is warranted to sustain its positive public health and financial impact.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Return on Investment of a Breast Cancer Screening Program in Tanzania: Opportunity for Patient and Public Education
    Heisler, Zoe
    Eastwood, Betsy
    Mwaiselage, Julius
    Kahesa, Crispin
    Msami, Khadija
    Soliman, Amr S.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (03) : 701 - 708
  • [32] Return on Investment of a Breast Cancer Screening Program in Tanzania: Opportunity for Patient and Public Education
    Zoe Heisler
    Betsy Eastwood
    Julius Mwaiselage
    Crispin Kahesa
    Khadija Msami
    Amr S. Soliman
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2022, 37 : 701 - 708
  • [33] An Evaluation of the Well at Dell Health Management Program: Health Risk Change and Financial Return on Investment
    Musich, Shirley
    McCalister, Tre'
    Wang, Sara
    Hawkins, Kevin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2015, 29 (03) : 147 - 157
  • [34] A Social-Return-On-Investment Analysis Of Bon Secours Hospital's 'Housing For Health' Affordable Housing Program
    Drabo, Emmanuel Fulgence
    Eckel, Grace
    Ross, Samuel L.
    Brozic, Michael
    Carlton, Chanie G.
    Warren, Tatiana Y.
    Kleb, George
    Laird, Aurelia
    Porter, Keshia M. Pollack
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2021, 40 (03) : 513 - 520
  • [35] 40 years of the National Immunization Program: a conquest of Brazilian Public Health
    da Silva Junior, Jarbas Barbosa
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA E SERVICOS DE SAUDE, 2013, 22 (01): : 7 - 8
  • [36] Integration of Social Return on Investment with Health Impact Assessment and evaluation frameworks
    Ashton, K.
    Cotter-Roberts, A.
    Dyakova, M.
    Green, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [37] Measuring Success: The Case for Calculating the Return on Investment of Environmental Public Health Tracking
    Charleston, Alex E.
    Banerjee, Anyana
    Carande-Kulis, Vilma G.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2008, 14 (06): : 600 - 604
  • [38] Maximizing return on investment for public health with open-source medical hardware
    Pearce, Joshua M.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2015, 29 (04) : 319 - 319
  • [39] THE IMPACT OF INVESTMENT IN PUBLIC HEALTH ON THE ACHIEVEMENT OF GOALS IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
    Carvalho, Josue de Lima
    Brasileiro, Tania Suely Azevedo
    NOVOS CADERNOS NAEA, 2024, 27 (01): : 187 - 213
  • [40] Intersystem return on investment in public mental health: Positive externality of public mental health expenditure for the jail system in the US
    Yoon, Jangho
    Luck, Jeff
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 170 : 133 - 142