The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Wentao [2 ]
Gong, Jian [1 ]
Gu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal polyp; Polypectomy; Incomplete resection rate; Cold snare polypectomy; Hot snare polypectomy; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR).ResultsSeven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resection depth for small colorectal polyps comparing cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
    Toyosawa, Junki
    Yamasaki, Yasushi
    Fujimoto, Tsuyoshi
    Tanaka, Shouichi
    Tanaka, Takehiro
    Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
    Okada, Hiroyuki
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (05) : E602 - E608
  • [42] COLD SNARE POLYPECTOMY OF SMALL COLON POLYPS WITH UNINTERRUPTED ANTICOAGULATION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Hussain, Maryam Rafaqat
    Altowaijri, Abdulaziz
    Almadi, Majid A.
    Barkun, Alan N.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S297 - S298
  • [43] Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Yong-Cai
    Dong, Quan
    Yao, Yan-Hua
    Lei, Jing-Jing
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 43 (06) : 1111 - 1120
  • [44] Safety and efficacy of cold versus hot snare polypectomy including colorectal polyps ≥1 cm in size
    Takeuchi, Yoji
    Shichijo, Satoki
    Uedo, Noriya
    Kawakami, Yushi
    Okubo, Yuki
    Tani, Yasuhiro
    Sakurai, Hirohisa
    Nakamura, Takahiko
    Miyake, Muneaki
    Matsueda, Katsunori
    Ishihara, Ryu
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 34 (02) : 274 - 283
  • [45] Safety of Cold vs Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ali, Saeed
    Khetpal, Neelam
    Hussain, Sana
    Fatima, Munazza
    Khan, Maham
    Ali, Asad
    Inayat, Irteza
    Khan, Muhammad Ali
    Hasan, Muhammad K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115
  • [46] Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy
    Suzuki, Sho
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Kusano, Chika
    Ikehara, Hisatomo
    Sugita, Akihiro
    Yamauchi, Misa
    Moriyama, Mitsuhiko
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (04) : 1095 - 1103
  • [47] Comparing Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy Techniques: Insights From a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Elfaituri, Muhammed
    Elfaituri, Ala
    BenGhatnsh, Ahmed
    Faraj, Hazem
    Msherghi, Ahmed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S199 - S199
  • [48] Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps Using an Exclusive Cold Polypectomy snare vs. a Conventional Polypectomy snare
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Nakayama, Yoshiko
    Makino, Toshiyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB266 - AB266
  • [49] Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Oh, Chang Kyo
    Cho, Young Wook
    Jung, Jiyoon
    Lee, Hee Yeon
    Kim, Jin Bae
    Cho, Young-Seok
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [50] Comparison of newly found polyps after removal of small colorectal polyps with cold or hot snare polypectomy
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Makino, Toshiyuki
    Ichise, Yasuyuki
    Kajiyama, Masashi
    Kato, Naoyuki
    Tanaka, Naoki
    ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2015, 78 (04): : 406 - 410