The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Wentao [2 ]
Gong, Jian [1 ]
Gu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal polyp; Polypectomy; Incomplete resection rate; Cold snare polypectomy; Hot snare polypectomy; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR).ResultsSeven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Lee, Bo-In
    Choi, Hwang
    Jun, Sun-Young
    Park, Eun Su
    Park, Jae Myung
    Lee, In-Seok
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Kim, Sang Woo
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (03) : 741 - 747
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    de Benito Sanz, Marina
    Hernandez, Luis
    Garcia Martinez, Maria Isabel
    Diez-Redondo, Pilar
    Joao Matias, Diana
    Gonzalez-Santiago, Jesus M.
    Ibanez, Mercedes
    Nunez Rodriguez, Maria Henar
    Cimavilla, Marta
    Tafur, Carla
    Mata, Laura
    Guardiola-Arevalo, Antonio
    Feito, Jorge
    Javier Garcia-Alonso, Francisco
    ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [33] Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: A meta-analysis
    Qu, Junyan
    Jian, Haixu
    Li, Lixiang
    Zhang, Yan
    Feng, Bingcheng
    Li, Zhen
    Zuo, Xiuli
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [34] Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Min Ji
    Na, Soo Young
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Choi, Hyun Ho
    Kim, Dae Bum
    Ji, Jeong-Seon
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Choi, Hwang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (05): : 3789 - 3795
  • [35] Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Min Ji Kim
    Soo Young Na
    Joon Sung Kim
    Hyun Ho Choi
    Dae Bum Kim
    Jeong-Seon Ji
    Byung-Wook Kim
    Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 3789 - 3795
  • [36] Effectiveness and Safety of Thin vs Thick Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Khan, Rishad
    Samnani, Sunil
    Vaska, Marcus
    Grover, Samir
    Walsh, Catharine
    Mosko, Jeffrey
    Bourke, Michael
    Heitman, Steven
    Forbes, Nauzer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S218 - S219
  • [37] Comparison of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps
    Thuy Tran Ngoc
    Hoang Duc Dong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 : 103 - 103
  • [38] Effectiveness and safety of thin vs. thick cold snare polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Rishad
    Samnani, Sunil
    Vaska, Marcus
    Grover, Samir C.
    Walsh, Catharine M.
    Mosko, Jeffrey
    Bourke, Michael
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Forbes, Nauzer
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (01) : E99 - E107
  • [39] Cold Snare Polypectomy in Small (&lt;10 mm) Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Canakis, Andrew
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Bapaye, Jay
    Canakis, Justin
    Twery, Benjamin
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Ramai, Daryl
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Adler, Douglas G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 58 (04) : 370 - 377
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, De-feng
    Van Overbeke, Lode
    Ohata, Ken
    Wang, Li-sheng
    Yao, Jun
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2022, 54 (11) : 1486 - 1493