The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Wentao [2 ]
Gong, Jian [1 ]
Gu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal polyp; Polypectomy; Incomplete resection rate; Cold snare polypectomy; Hot snare polypectomy; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR).ResultsSeven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cold Snare Polypectomy With or Without Submucosal Injection for Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xiu-He Lv
    Tong Liu
    Zi-Jing Wang
    Tao Gan
    Jin-Lin Yang
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2024, 69 : 1411 - 1420
  • [22] Hot snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Seung-Jun
    Lee, Bo-In
    Jung, Eun Sun
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Jun, Sun-Young
    Kim, Woohyeon
    Ham, Hyoju
    Kim, Minah
    Lee, Sung Hak
    Lee, Han Hee
    Park, Jae Myung
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (09): : 5096 - 5103
  • [23] Hot snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Seung-Jun Kim
    Bo-In Lee
    Eun Sun Jung
    Joon Sung Kim
    Sun-Young Jun
    Woohyeon Kim
    Hyoju Ham
    Minah Kim
    Sung Hak Lee
    Han Hee Lee
    Jae Myung Park
    Myung-Gyu Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 5096 - 5103
  • [24] The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ali, Saeed
    Khetpal, Neelam
    Fatima, Munazza
    Hussain, Sana
    Ali, Asad
    Khan, Muhammad Ali
    Childs, Christopher
    Hasan, Muhammad K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [25] Randomized Control Trial: Cold SNARE Polypectomy Versus Hot SNARE Polypectomy in Endoscopic Resection of Large Polyps
    Pillai, Ajish
    Zuchelli, Tobias
    Piraka, Cyrus
    Ringold, Daniel
    Morgenstern, Ricardo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB414 - AB414
  • [26] Safety of cold snare polypectomy with periprocedural antithrombotic agents for colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeh, Jen-Hao
    Wang, Wen-Lun
    Lin, Chih-Wen
    Lee, Ching-Tai
    Tseng, Cheng-Hao
    Hsiao, Po-Jen
    Liu, Yu-Peng
    Wang, Jaw-Yuan
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 15
  • [27] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF COLD BIOPSY VERSUS COLD SNARE POLYPECTOMY FOR THE REMOVAL OF SMALL COLORECTAL POLYPS
    Gudsoorkar, Vineet
    Jain, Amita
    Krishnan, Kumar
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 152 (05) : S732 - S733
  • [28] Comparative meta-analysis of cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: assessing efficacy and safety
    Wang, Shouqi
    Zhang, Qi
    Meng, Li Rong
    Wu, Ying
    Fong, Pedro
    Zhou, Weixia
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [29] Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Lv, Yong-Cai
    Yao, Yan-Hua
    Lei, Jing-Jing
    Tang, Tao
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 42 (06) : 757 - 765
  • [30] Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Yong-Cai Lv
    Yan-Hua Yao
    Jing-Jing Lei
    Tao Tang
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2023, 42 (6) : 757 - 765