The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Wentao [2 ]
Gong, Jian [1 ]
Gu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal polyp; Polypectomy; Incomplete resection rate; Cold snare polypectomy; Hot snare polypectomy; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR).ResultsSeven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wentao Liu
    Jian Gong
    Li Gu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [2] Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    Mohamed, Islam
    Jaber, Fouad S.
    Katamesh, Basant E.
    Shaikhkhalil, Hosam
    Elzeftawy, Mohamed A.
    Mahmoud, Abdelrahman
    Afifi, Ahmed M.
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    Othman, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 57 (08) : 760 - 773
  • [3] A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Hot Snare Polypectomy and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing Small Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Winston, Kevin
    Maulahela, Hasan
    Raharjo, Daniell Edward
    Tjoa, Kevin
    Jonlean, Reganedgary
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shinozaki, Satoshi
    Kobayashi, Yasutoshi
    Hayashi, Yoshikazu
    Sakamoto, Hirotsugu
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Yamamoto, Hironori
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 30 (05) : 592 - 599
  • [5] Systematic review and meta-analysis of cold snare polypectomy and hot snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps
    Niu, Chengu
    Bapaye, Jay
    Zhang, Jing
    Liu, Hongli
    Zhu, Kaiwen
    Farooq, Umer
    Zahid, Salman
    Chathuranga, Dileepa
    Okolo, Patrick, I
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (09) : 1458 - 1467
  • [6] Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Moond, Vishali
    Loganathan, Priyadarshini
    Malik, Sheza
    Dahiya, Dushyant Singh
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Ramai, Daryl
    Mcginnis, Michele
    Madhu, Deepak
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Chandan, Saurabh
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [7] Cold Snare vs Hot Snare Polypectomy for Subcentimeter Colorectal Polyps: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Singh, Sahib
    Mohan, Babu
    Sharma, Neil
    Vinayek, Rakesh
    Dutta, Sudhir
    Le, Michelle
    Adler, Douglas G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S226 - S226
  • [8] A META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COLD VERSUS HOT SNARE POLYPECTOMY FOR COLORECTAL POLYPS RESECTION
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    Mohamed, Islam
    Jaber, Fouad
    Katamesh, Basant
    Shaikhkhalil, Hosam
    Elzeftawy, Mohamed
    Mahmoud, Abdelrahman
    Afifi, Ahmed
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    Othman, Mohamed
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB530 - AB531
  • [9] Cold snare polypectomy versus hot snare polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps
    Aslan, Fatih
    Camci, Mehmet
    Alper, Emrah
    Akpinar, Zehra
    Arabul, Mahmut
    Celik, Mustafa
    Unsal, Belkis
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 25 (03): : 279 - 283
  • [10] Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Santo, Paula Arruda do Espirito
    Meine, Gilmara Coelho
    Baraldo, Stefano
    Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi
    ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 56 (07) : 503 - 511