Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias

被引:6
|
作者
Lu, Haidong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gonsalves, Gregg S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westreich, Daniel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal diagrams; collider adjustment bias; collider stratification bias; epidemiologic research; overadjustment bias; selection bias;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response to selection bias, confounding, or information bias?
    Mahmud, Azra
    Jerrard-Dunne, Paula
    Jatoi, Noor A.
    Feely, John
    HYPERTENSION, 2007, 50 (01) : E10 - E10
  • [42] Uncovering selection bias in case-control studies using Bayesian post-stratification
    Geneletti, S.
    Best, N.
    Toledano, M. B.
    Elliott, P.
    Richardson, S.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (15) : 2555 - 2570
  • [43] Selection and Collider Bias in Electronic Health Databases for the Estimation of Drug Safety and Effectiveness
    Schnitzer, Mireille E.
    Blais, Lucie
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 86 - 86
  • [44] Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    Tilling, Kate
    Taylor, Amy E.
    Evans, David M.
    Smith, George Davey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (01) : 226 - 235
  • [45] Adverse selection, seller effort, and selection bias
    Wimmer, Bradley S.
    Chezum, Brian
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2006, 73 (01) : 201 - 218
  • [46] Letter re: stratification of meta-analyses based on risk of bias is appropriate and does not induce selection bias
    Page, Matthew J.
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Hansen, Camilla
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 115 : 175 - 176
  • [47] Impact of Collider-Stratification Bias (M-bias) in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies: A Simulation Study
    Liu, Wei
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    Setoguchi, Soko
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 : S212 - S213
  • [48] Berkson's Bias, Selection Bias, and Missing Data
    Westreich, Daniel
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (01) : 159 - 164
  • [49] Selection Bias in the Comparative Political Science: The Case of Croatia
    Kasapovic, Mirjana
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR VERGLEICHENDE POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT, 2011, 5 (02): : 329 - 343
  • [50] Fertility desires and sample selection bias: The case of Senegal
    Saila-Ngita, D
    Bravo-Ureta, B
    Perez-Escamilla, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (05) : 1177 - 1177