共 50 条
Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias
被引:6
|作者:
Lu, Haidong
[2
,3
,4
]
Gonsalves, Gregg S.
[3
,4
,5
]
Westreich, Daniel
[1
,6
]
机构:
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
causal diagrams;
collider adjustment bias;
collider stratification bias;
epidemiologic research;
overadjustment bias;
selection bias;
D O I:
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文