Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias

被引:6
|
作者
Lu, Haidong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gonsalves, Gregg S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westreich, Daniel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal diagrams; collider adjustment bias; collider stratification bias; epidemiologic research; overadjustment bias; selection bias;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selection bias in case-referent studies
    Norell, SE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 145 (09) : 859 - 860
  • [22] Natural selection bias?
    Tregenza, T
    Wedell, N
    NATURE, 1997, 386 (6622) : 234 - 234
  • [23] SELECTION BIAS - A REPLY
    WING, RR
    BECKER, DJ
    ORCHARD, TJ
    LAPORTE, RL
    DIABETES CARE, 1986, 9 (01) : 94 - 95
  • [24] Subgroup or Selection Bias?
    Lainscak, Mitja
    von Haehling, Stephan
    Anker, Stefan D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (18) : 1514 - 1514
  • [25] Selection on Codon Bias
    Hershberg, Ruth
    Petrov, Dmitri A.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 2008, 42 : 287 - 299
  • [26] VARIETIES OF SELECTION BIAS
    HECKMAN, J
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1990, 80 (02): : 313 - 318
  • [27] Beware selection bias
    Barrett, Jon F. R.
    Zaltz, Arthur
    Geary, Michael
    Sermer, Mathew
    Kingdom, John
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (34) : E1096 - E1096
  • [28] Potential selection bias?
    Arness, M
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2000, 165 (01) : 28 - 28
  • [29] More on Selection Bias
    Shahar, Eyal
    Shahar, Doron J.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (03) : 429 - 430
  • [30] The directions of selection bias
    Jiang, Zhichao
    Ding, Peng
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2017, 125 : 104 - 109