Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias

被引:6
|
作者
Lu, Haidong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gonsalves, Gregg S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westreich, Daniel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal diagrams; collider adjustment bias; collider stratification bias; epidemiologic research; overadjustment bias; selection bias;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selection bias? Reply
    Wollstein, Gadi
    Schuman, Joel S.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (12) : 2361 - 2361
  • [32] Response to "Selection bias"
    Boggild, Andrea K.
    Libman, Michael
    Yansouni, Cedric P.
    Freedman, David O.
    Kuhn, Susan
    Plourde, Pierre
    Mirzanejad, Yazdan
    Hajek, Jan
    Chakrabarti, Sumontra
    Geduld, Jennifer
    McCarthy, Anne E.
    Vincelette, Jean
    Ghesquiere, Wayne
    Kain, Kevin C.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (18) : E674 - E674
  • [33] Natural selection bias?
    Tom Tregenza
    Nina Wedell
    Nature, 1997, 386 : 234 - 234
  • [34] Quantification of collider-stratification bias and the birthweight paradox
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    Schisterman, Enrique F.
    Perkins, Neil J.
    Platt, Robert W.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 394 - 402
  • [35] Gender Bias and Selection Bias in House Elections
    Jeffrey Milyo
    Samantha Schosberg
    Public Choice, 2000, 105 : 41 - 59
  • [36] Prediction bias and selection bias: An empirical analysis
    Cahan, S
    Gamliel, E
    APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2001, 14 (02) : 109 - 123
  • [37] Gender bias and selection bias in House elections
    Milyo, J
    Schosberg, S
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2000, 105 (1-2) : 41 - 59
  • [38] Selection Bias and Information Bias in Clinical Research
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Jager, Kitty J.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    Zoccali, Carmine
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 115 (02): : C94 - C99
  • [39] Art and gender: market bias or selection bias?
    Cameron, Laurie
    Goetzmann, William N.
    Nozari, Milad
    JOURNAL OF CULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 43 (02) : 279 - 307
  • [40] Art and gender: market bias or selection bias?
    Laurie Cameron
    William N. Goetzmann
    Milad Nozari
    Journal of Cultural Economics, 2019, 43 : 279 - 307