Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district

被引:12
|
作者
Gao, Jie [1 ]
Zhuo, La [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duan, Ximing [1 ]
Wu, Pute [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Taigu 030801, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Water saving Agr Arid Reg China, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[5] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid Area, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Irrigation techniques; Irrigation strategies; Water footprint; Benchmarking; Water-saving potential; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The water footprint (WF) of crop production is a measure of the volumes of blue water (irrigation water) and green water (effective precipitation) consumed during crop growth. Setting the WF benchmarks of crop pro-duction in an irrigation district, exploring the optimal tillage practices, and clearly specifying blue and green water-saving potentials (WSPs) are essential for efficient utilization and reasonable allocation of agricultural water resources. However, related studies disregarded the WF benchmark setting according to tillage practices and the corresponding WSPs at the irrigation district scale. Meanwhile, the evaluation of WSP is limited to blue water. Considering summer maize and winter wheat grown in Baojixia Irrigation District (BID) of Shaanxi Province in China as the study case, this study aims to evaluate the gross irrigation WSP, actual blue and green WSPs based on crop WF simulation and WF benchmark setting for the "best" tillage practice. Eighteen water -saving tillage practice scenarios were set considering three irrigation techniques, three irrigation strategies, and two mulching practices. Results show that crop responses to different tillage practices differ. Maize WF has low sensitivity whereas wheat WF shows a significant difference following a change in irrigation techniques. In the practice under 40% deficit irrigation with no mulching, there is the highest actual WSPs, but at the cost of at least 57% reduction in crop yield. Whereas the practice of 20% deficit irrigation, furrow irrigation, and mulching has no yield reduction and relatively low WF, which can save 20% blue water and 8-12% green water in the BID, which is the optimal balance point between the yield and water consumption of the two crops. From the perspective of crop WF, this study quantified the agricultural WSPs of different water resources, and formulated a method for evaluating agricultural WSPs based on set WF benchmarks, to provide reference for building a water -saving culture, and sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rice evapotranspiration at the field and canopy scales under water-saving irrigation
    Liu, Xiaoyin
    Xu, Junzeng
    Yang, Shihong
    Zhang, Jiangang
    METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2018, 130 (02) : 227 - 240
  • [32] An assessment of the role of ponds in the adoption of water-saving irrigation practices in the Zhanghe Irrigation System, China
    Mushtaq, Shahbaz
    Dawe, David
    Lin, Hong
    Moya, Piedad
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 83 (1-2) : 100 - 110
  • [33] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies
    Faiz-ul Islam, Syed
    Sander, Bjoern Ole
    Quilty, James R.
    de Neergaard, Andreas
    van Groenigen, Jan Willem
    Jensen, Lars Stoumann
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 739
  • [34] Absorption Characteristic of Nitrogen for Rice Roots Under Water-saving Irrigation
    Yang, Shi-Hong
    Gao, Xiao-Li
    Wei, Zheng
    Xu, Jun-Zeng
    Wang, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING (ICEEE 2015), 2015, : 433 - 443
  • [35] Rice evapotranspiration at the field and canopy scales under water-saving irrigation
    Xiaoyin Liu
    Junzeng Xu
    Shihong Yang
    Jiangang Zhang
    Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2018, 130 : 227 - 240
  • [36] A water quality changing prediction model for agricultural water-saving irrigation based on PSO-LSSVR
    Dong, Jian-Gang
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhang, Yong-Heng
    Computer Modelling and New Technologies, 2014, 18 (07): : 377 - 381
  • [37] Nitrogen cycling and associated grey water footprint in croplands under different irrigation practices
    Zhao, Danyue
    Wang, Wei
    Ji, Xiangxiang
    Wu, Pute
    Zhuo, La
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 480
  • [38] A field-modeling study for assessing temporal variations of soil-water-crop interactions under water-saving irrigation strategies
    Karandish, Fatemeh
    Simunek, Jiri
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 178 : 291 - 303
  • [39] Rice yield and water productivity in response to water-saving irrigation practices in China: A meta-analysis
    Yu, Qian
    Dai, Yulong
    Wei, Jun
    Wang, Jiaer
    Liao, Bin
    Cui, Yuanlai
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 302
  • [40] A Review of Precision Irrigation Water-Saving Technology under Changing Climate for Enhancing Water Use Efficiency, Crop Yield, and Environmental Footprints
    Lakhiar, Imran Ali
    Yan, Haofang
    Zhang, Chuan
    Wang, Guoqing
    He, Bin
    Hao, Beibei
    Han, Yujing
    Wang, Biyu
    Bao, Rongxuan
    Syed, Tabinda Naz
    Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz
    Rakibuzzaman, Md.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07):