Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district

被引:12
|
作者
Gao, Jie [1 ]
Zhuo, La [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duan, Ximing [1 ]
Wu, Pute [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Taigu 030801, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Water saving Agr Arid Reg China, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[5] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid Area, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Irrigation techniques; Irrigation strategies; Water footprint; Benchmarking; Water-saving potential; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The water footprint (WF) of crop production is a measure of the volumes of blue water (irrigation water) and green water (effective precipitation) consumed during crop growth. Setting the WF benchmarks of crop pro-duction in an irrigation district, exploring the optimal tillage practices, and clearly specifying blue and green water-saving potentials (WSPs) are essential for efficient utilization and reasonable allocation of agricultural water resources. However, related studies disregarded the WF benchmark setting according to tillage practices and the corresponding WSPs at the irrigation district scale. Meanwhile, the evaluation of WSP is limited to blue water. Considering summer maize and winter wheat grown in Baojixia Irrigation District (BID) of Shaanxi Province in China as the study case, this study aims to evaluate the gross irrigation WSP, actual blue and green WSPs based on crop WF simulation and WF benchmark setting for the "best" tillage practice. Eighteen water -saving tillage practice scenarios were set considering three irrigation techniques, three irrigation strategies, and two mulching practices. Results show that crop responses to different tillage practices differ. Maize WF has low sensitivity whereas wheat WF shows a significant difference following a change in irrigation techniques. In the practice under 40% deficit irrigation with no mulching, there is the highest actual WSPs, but at the cost of at least 57% reduction in crop yield. Whereas the practice of 20% deficit irrigation, furrow irrigation, and mulching has no yield reduction and relatively low WF, which can save 20% blue water and 8-12% green water in the BID, which is the optimal balance point between the yield and water consumption of the two crops. From the perspective of crop WF, this study quantified the agricultural WSPs of different water resources, and formulated a method for evaluating agricultural WSPs based on set WF benchmarks, to provide reference for building a water -saving culture, and sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Water-saving irrigation regime for winter wheat in county areas under water resources constraints
    Zhu J.
    Zhao C.
    Guo R.
    Zhou L.
    1600, Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (37): : 92 - 100
  • [42] Regional modeling of winter wheat yield and water productivity under water-saving irrigation scenarios
    Ahmadi, Seyed Hamid
    Jorenush, Mohammad Hadi
    Nasab, Saeed Boroomand
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 13 (10) : 3547 - 3565
  • [43] Modelling water consumption, N fates and maize yield under different water-saving management practices in China and Pakistan
    Leghari, Shah Jahan
    Hu, Kelin
    Wei, Yichang
    Wang, Tongchao
    Bhutto, Tofique Ahmed
    Buriro, Mahmooda
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 255
  • [44] Design of rice intelligent water-saving irrigation system based on agricultural internet of things
    Li, Jinmao
    He, Hu
    2018 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY (SCSET 2018), 2019, 1176
  • [45] Does reliability of water resources matter in the adoption of water-saving irrigation practices? A case study in the Zhanghe irrigation system, China
    Mushtaq, Shahbaz
    Khan, Shahbaz
    Hafeez, Mohsin
    Hanjra, Munir A.
    WATER POLICY, 2009, 11 (06) : 661 - 679
  • [46] Effects of straw returning on rice growth and yield under water-saving irrigation
    Wei, Qi
    Xu, Junzeng
    Sun, Lu
    Wang, Haiyu
    Lv, Yuping
    Li, Yawei
    Hammed, Fazli
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (01): : 66 - 74
  • [47] Effects of Irrigation and Drainage Modes on Crop Water Footprint in Rice Production
    Wu M.
    Cao X.
    Ren J.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52 (01): : 256 - 262
  • [48] Research of the path optimization in agricultural water-saving irrigation and canal system water distribution in Ant colony algorithm
    Deng, Lei Lei
    Wang, Zi Tong
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC, INFORMATION AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2016, 44
  • [49] Effects of Biochar Addition on Rice Growth and Yield under Water-Saving Irrigation
    Chen, Xi
    Yang, Shihong
    Ding, Jie
    Jiang, Zewei
    Sun, Xiao
    WATER, 2021, 13 (02)
  • [50] Water, Salt, and Ion Transport and Its Response to Water-Saving Irrigation in the Hetao Irrigation District Based on the SWAT-Salt Model
    Ao, Chang
    Jiang, Donglin
    Bailey, Ryan T.
    Dong, Jianhua
    Zeng, Wenzhi
    Huang, Jiesheng
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (05):