Nitrogen cycling and associated grey water footprint in croplands under different irrigation practices

The pervasive application of nitrogen (N) fertilisers in agriculture poses a significant threat to freshwater ecosystems. The grey water footprint (GWF) is a measure of the volume of freshwater required to assimilate the relative water pollutants resulted from N leaching-runoff processes. The responses of N cycling and associated regional GWF to crop production under different irrigation methods have not been investigated. In this study, the N leaching-runoff rate, N2O, and NH3 emissions in croplands and the associated GWF per unit crop yield (UGWF) and annual total GWF (TGWF) of winter wheat-summer maize crop rotations across the Hebei, Shandong, and Henan Region (HSHR) of China were simulated and evaluated at the prefecture level over the 2004-2020 period. Four irrigation scenarios were modelled: furrow, sprinkler, surface drip, and subsurface drip irrigation. The results showed significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity in N leaching-runoff rates and emissions of N2O, and NH3. The N leaching-runoff rates for winter wheat and summer maize ranged from 3.9% to 10.9% and 15.0%-32.3%, respectively. With changing different irrigation methods, N leaching-runoff rates exhibited greater sensitivity than N2O and NH3 emissions; this sensitivity was more pronounced in winter wheat than in summer maize. Findings reveal that N pollution is influenced not only by irrigation methods but also by weather conditions, crop-specific rooting characteristics, sowing time, and soil texture. Winter wheat UGWF under the four irrigation methods mostly followed the order of furrow > sprinkler irrigation > surface drip irrigation > subsurface drip irrigation. Conversely, for summer maize, subsurface drip irrigation resulted in a higher UGWF compared to furrow irrigation, mainly due to increased water percolation thus higher N leaching-runoff rate in near-saturated soil with higher rainfall. This result reveals the potential conflict between water-saving irrigation and N pollution control. This analysis underscores the necessity of recognising the combined effects of agricultural management practices on water conservation and environmental safeguarding.