Assessing quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator using the structural similarity index

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Hong [1 ]
Zhang, Baoshe [2 ]
Lasio, Giovanni [2 ]
Chen, Shifeng [2 ]
Tehrani, Joubin Nasehi [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 500 Upper Chesapeake Dr, Bel Air, MD 21014 USA
来源
关键词
Gamma index test; MLC; QA; SSI*; Structural Similarity Index; VMAT; GAMMA INDEX; MLC; IMRT; VERIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; DELIVERY; PLAN;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the viability of utilizing the Structural Similarity Index (SSI*) as an innovative imaging metric for quality assurance (QA) of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Additionally, we compared the results obtained through SSI* with those derived from a conventional Gamma index test for three types of Varian machines (Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge) over a 12-week period of MLC QA in our clinic.MethodTo assess sensitivity to MLC positioning errors, we designed a 1 cm slit on the reference MLC, subsequently shifted by 0.5-5 mm on the target MLC. For evaluating sensitivity to output error, we irradiated five 25 cm x 25 cm open fields on the portal image with varying Monitor Units (MUs) of 96-100. We compared SSI* and Gamma index tests using three linear accelerator (LINAC) machines: Varian Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge, with MLC leaf widths of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 mm. Weekly QA included VMAT and static field modes, with Picket fence test images acquired. Mechanical uncertainties related to the LINAC head, electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and MLC during gantry rotation and leaf motion were monitored.ResultsThe Gamma index test started detecting the MLC shift at a threshold of 4 mm, whereas the SSI* metric showed sensitivity to shifts as small as 2 mm. Moreover, the Gamma index test identified dose changes at 95MUs, indicating a 5% dose difference based on the distance to agreement (DTA)/dose difference (DD) criteria of 1 mm/3%. In contrast, the SSI* metric alerted to dose differences starting from 97MUs, corresponding to a 3% dose difference. The Gamma index test passed all measurements conducted on each machine. However, the SSI* metric rejected all measurements from the Edge and Trilogy machines and two from the Truebeam.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the SSI* exhibits greater sensitivity than the Gamma index test in detecting MLC positioning errors and dose changes between static and VMAT modes. The SSI* metric outperformed the Gamma index test regarding sensitivity across these parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Multi-Leaf Collimator Error Detection: Comparison of EPID and Array-Based Methods
    Roles, S.
    Winiecki, J.
    Rapchak, A.
    Owen, G.
    Mart, C.
    McDonald, D.
    Godwin, W.
    Maynard, M.
    Peng, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E895 - E896
  • [22] Clinical significance of multi-leaf collimator calibration errors
    Norvill, Craig
    Jenetsky, Guy
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2016, 39 (01) : 253 - 258
  • [23] Treatment set-up verification: quality assurance technique for LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy using micro multi-leaf collimator
    Lazaridis, EA
    Xydis, K
    Theodorou, K
    Kappas, C
    Eble, MJ
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2004, 180 : 73 - 73
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF THE FIELD DEFINING PROPERTIES OF A MULTI-LEAF COLLIMATOR
    MALEKI, N
    KIJEWSKI, PK
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1983, 10 (04) : 518 - 518
  • [25] Treatment set-up verification: quality assurance technique for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy using micro multi-leaf collimator
    Lazaridis, E
    Xydis, K
    Theodorou, K
    Kappas, C
    Eble, M
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S436 - S436
  • [26] Incorporating multi-leaf collimator leaf sequencing into iterative IMRT optimization
    Siebers, JV
    Lauterbach, M
    Keall, PJ
    Mohan, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 952 - 959
  • [27] ANALYSIS OF THE FIELD DEFINING PROPERTIES OF A MULTI-LEAF COLLIMATOR
    MALEKI, N
    KIJEWSKI, P
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 11 (03) : 390 - 390
  • [28] Commissioning of multi-leaf collimator for fast neutron therapy
    Yudelev, M.
    Mogili, N.
    Hwang, T.
    Farr, J.
    Maughan, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2080 - 2080
  • [29] MATCHING OF ELECTRON AND PHOTON BEAMS WITH A MULTI-LEAF COLLIMATOR
    KARLSSON, M
    ZACKRISSON, B
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [30] Clinical significance of multi-leaf collimator calibration errors
    Craig Norvill
    Guy Jenetsky
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2016, 39 : 253 - 258