Assessing quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator using the structural similarity index

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Hong [1 ]
Zhang, Baoshe [2 ]
Lasio, Giovanni [2 ]
Chen, Shifeng [2 ]
Tehrani, Joubin Nasehi [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 500 Upper Chesapeake Dr, Bel Air, MD 21014 USA
来源
关键词
Gamma index test; MLC; QA; SSI*; Structural Similarity Index; VMAT; GAMMA INDEX; MLC; IMRT; VERIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; DELIVERY; PLAN;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14288
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the viability of utilizing the Structural Similarity Index (SSI*) as an innovative imaging metric for quality assurance (QA) of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC). Additionally, we compared the results obtained through SSI* with those derived from a conventional Gamma index test for three types of Varian machines (Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge) over a 12-week period of MLC QA in our clinic.MethodTo assess sensitivity to MLC positioning errors, we designed a 1 cm slit on the reference MLC, subsequently shifted by 0.5-5 mm on the target MLC. For evaluating sensitivity to output error, we irradiated five 25 cm x 25 cm open fields on the portal image with varying Monitor Units (MUs) of 96-100. We compared SSI* and Gamma index tests using three linear accelerator (LINAC) machines: Varian Trilogy, Truebeam, and Edge, with MLC leaf widths of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 mm. Weekly QA included VMAT and static field modes, with Picket fence test images acquired. Mechanical uncertainties related to the LINAC head, electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and MLC during gantry rotation and leaf motion were monitored.ResultsThe Gamma index test started detecting the MLC shift at a threshold of 4 mm, whereas the SSI* metric showed sensitivity to shifts as small as 2 mm. Moreover, the Gamma index test identified dose changes at 95MUs, indicating a 5% dose difference based on the distance to agreement (DTA)/dose difference (DD) criteria of 1 mm/3%. In contrast, the SSI* metric alerted to dose differences starting from 97MUs, corresponding to a 3% dose difference. The Gamma index test passed all measurements conducted on each machine. However, the SSI* metric rejected all measurements from the Edge and Trilogy machines and two from the Truebeam.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the SSI* exhibits greater sensitivity than the Gamma index test in detecting MLC positioning errors and dose changes between static and VMAT modes. The SSI* metric outperformed the Gamma index test regarding sensitivity across these parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A quality assurance procedure for the Varian multi-leaf collimator
    Mubata, CD
    Childs, P
    Bidmead, AM
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (02): : 423 - 431
  • [2] Multi-leaf collimator quality assurance using pulse width modulation analysis
    Shoales, J.
    Boyer, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2474 - 2474
  • [3] Quality Assurance of Truebeam Multi-Leaf Collimator Using a MLC QA Phantom
    Zhang, J.
    Hong, D.
    Lu, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3485 - 3485
  • [4] Automated Analysis of Leaf Position Accuracy for Multi-Leaf Collimator Quality Assurance
    Du, W.
    Casey, K.
    Kudchadker, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [5] Motion of Electronic Portal Imaging Devices and Clinical Implications for Multi-Leaf Collimator Quality Assurance
    Nasehi Tehrani, J.
    Kalavagunta, C.
    Lasio, G.
    Chen, S.
    Yi, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E639 - E639
  • [6] Monitorization of the Dynamic Multi-Leaf Collimator Performance Using Log Files - a Quality Assurance Tool for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Martins da Silva, A.
    Pereira, A.
    Barreiros, M.
    Silva, R.
    Faria, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3794 - 3794
  • [7] Multi-leaf collimator phantom: A quality assurance tool for radiation therapy planning systems and CT simulators
    McNiven, A
    Kron, T
    Van Dyk, J
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1449 - 1449
  • [8] Evaluation of AutoCAL for electronic portal imaging device-based multi-leaf collimator quality assurance
    Shameem T.J.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2016, 9 (1) : 95 - 98
  • [9] The effect of multi-leaf collimator leaf width on VMAT treatment plan quality
    Peiris, Gregory Sadharanu
    Whelan, Brendan
    Hardcastle, Nicholas
    Sheehy, Suzie Lynn
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [10] Radiotherapy plan quality using a double focused, double stacked multi-leaf collimator
    Bohoudi, O.
    Palacios, M. A.
    Slotman, B. J.
    Senan, S.
    Bruynzeel, A. M. E.
    Lagerwaard, F. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S273 - S273