Method for Determining Coastline Course Based on Low-Altitude Images Taken by a UAV

被引:2
|
作者
Marchel, Lukasz [1 ]
Specht, Mariusz [2 ]
机构
[1] Polish Naval Acad, Dept Nav & Hydrog, Smidowicza 69, PL-81127 Gdynia, Poland
[2] Gdynia Maritime Univ, Dept Transport & Logist, Morska 81-87, PL-81225 Gdynia, Poland
关键词
coastline; shoreline; Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); satellite imagery; Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); Real Time Kinematic (RTK); SHORELINE; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/rs15194700
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the most popular methods for determining coastline course are geodetic, satellite, and tacheometric techniques. None of the above-mentioned measurement methods allows marking out the shoreline both in an accurate way and with high coverage of the terrain with surveys. For this reason, intensive works are currently underway to find alternative solutions that could accurately, extensively, and quickly determine coastline course. Based on a review of the literature regarding shoreline measurements, it can be concluded that the photogrammetric method, based on low-altitude images taken by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), has the greatest potential. The aim of this publication is to present and validate a method for determining coastline course based on low-altitude photos taken by a drone. Shoreline measurements were carried out using the DJI Matrice 300 RTK UAV in the coastal zone at the public beach in Gdynia (Poland) in 2023. In addition, the coastline course was marked out using high-resolution satellite imagery (0.3-0.5 m). In order to calculate the accuracy of determining the shoreline by photogrammetric and satellite methods, it was decided to relate them to the coastline marked out using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) receiver with an accuracy of 2.4 cm Distance Root Mean Square (DRMS). Studies have shown that accuracies of determining coastline course using a UAV are 0.47 m (p = 0.95) for the orthophotomosaic method and 0.70 m (p = 0.95) for the Digital Surface Model (DSM), and are much more accurate than the satellite method, which amounted to 6.37 m (p = 0.95) for the Pleiades Neo satellite and 9.24 m (p = 0.95) for the Hexagon Europe satellite. Based on the obtained test results, it can be stated that the photogrammetric method using a UAV meets the accuracy requirements laid down for the most stringent International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) order, i.e., Exclusive Order (Total Horizontal Uncertainty (THU) of 5 m with a confidence level of 95%), which they relate to coastline measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A method for determination of the coordinates of a low-altitude target
    V. A. Balagurovskii
    A. S. Kondratiev
    N. P. Polishchuk
    Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 2012, 57 : 1107 - 1121
  • [42] A LOCATION METHOD FOR EXPLODING OBJECT AT LOW-ALTITUDE BASED ON COMPUTER VISION
    Xiong Xin
    Wu Zelin
    Shi Gengchen
    2011 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT (ICCTD 2011), VOL 1, 2012, : 145 - 149
  • [43] Mission Capability Estimation of Multicopter UAV for Low-Altitude Remote Sensing
    Liu, Chun
    Akbar, Akram
    Wu, Hangbin
    Zhou, Yuan
    Zhang, Shuhang
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2020, 100 (02) : 667 - 688
  • [44] Rapid identification of landslide, collapse and crack based on low-altitude remote sensing image of UAV
    Xu-gang Lian
    Zou-jun Li
    Hong-yan Yuan
    Ji-bo Liu
    Yan-jun Zhang
    Xiao-yu Liu
    Yan-ru Wu
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2020, 17 : 2915 - 2928
  • [45] Measurement-Based Characterization and Modeling for Low-Altitude UAV Air-to-Air Channels
    Liu, Tianyu
    Zhang, Zaichen
    Jiang, Hao
    Qian, Yurong
    Liu, Kailin
    Dang, Jian
    Wu, Liang
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 98832 - 98840
  • [46] Hardware in the Loop Simulation for Low-altitude UAV Link in the Complex Terrain
    Zheng, Yi
    Wang, Yuwen
    INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS II, PTS 1-3, 2013, 336-338 : 1907 - 1912
  • [47] Path loss measurement and modeling for low-altitude UAV access channels
    Wang, Kun
    Zhang, Ruonan
    Wu, Liang
    Zhong, Zhimeng
    He, Lin
    Liu, Jiawei
    Pang, Xiaoyan
    2017 IEEE 86TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC-FALL), 2017,
  • [48] Ice Velocity in Upstream of Heilongjiang Based on UAV Low-Altitude Remote Sensing and the SIFT Algorithm
    Wang, Enliang
    Hu, Shengbo
    Han, Hongwei
    Li, Yuang
    Ren, Zhifeng
    Du, Shilin
    WATER, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [49] Rapid identification of landslide,collapse and crack based on low-altitude remote sensing image of UAV
    LIAN Xu-gang
    LI Zou-jun
    YUAN Hong-yan
    LIU Ji-bo
    ZHANG Yan-jun
    LIU Xiao-yu
    WU Yan-ru
    JournalofMountainScience, 2020, 17 (12) : 2915 - 2928
  • [50] Rapid identification of landslide, collapse and crack based on low-altitude remote sensing image of UAV
    Lian Xu-gang
    Li Zou-jun
    Yuan Hong-yan
    Liu Ji-bo
    Zhang Yan-jun
    Liu Xiao-yu
    Wu Yan-ru
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2020, 17 (12) : 2915 - 2928