Method for Determining Coastline Course Based on Low-Altitude Images Taken by a UAV

被引:2
|
作者
Marchel, Lukasz [1 ]
Specht, Mariusz [2 ]
机构
[1] Polish Naval Acad, Dept Nav & Hydrog, Smidowicza 69, PL-81127 Gdynia, Poland
[2] Gdynia Maritime Univ, Dept Transport & Logist, Morska 81-87, PL-81225 Gdynia, Poland
关键词
coastline; shoreline; Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); satellite imagery; Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); Real Time Kinematic (RTK); SHORELINE; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/rs15194700
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the most popular methods for determining coastline course are geodetic, satellite, and tacheometric techniques. None of the above-mentioned measurement methods allows marking out the shoreline both in an accurate way and with high coverage of the terrain with surveys. For this reason, intensive works are currently underway to find alternative solutions that could accurately, extensively, and quickly determine coastline course. Based on a review of the literature regarding shoreline measurements, it can be concluded that the photogrammetric method, based on low-altitude images taken by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), has the greatest potential. The aim of this publication is to present and validate a method for determining coastline course based on low-altitude photos taken by a drone. Shoreline measurements were carried out using the DJI Matrice 300 RTK UAV in the coastal zone at the public beach in Gdynia (Poland) in 2023. In addition, the coastline course was marked out using high-resolution satellite imagery (0.3-0.5 m). In order to calculate the accuracy of determining the shoreline by photogrammetric and satellite methods, it was decided to relate them to the coastline marked out using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) receiver with an accuracy of 2.4 cm Distance Root Mean Square (DRMS). Studies have shown that accuracies of determining coastline course using a UAV are 0.47 m (p = 0.95) for the orthophotomosaic method and 0.70 m (p = 0.95) for the Digital Surface Model (DSM), and are much more accurate than the satellite method, which amounted to 6.37 m (p = 0.95) for the Pleiades Neo satellite and 9.24 m (p = 0.95) for the Hexagon Europe satellite. Based on the obtained test results, it can be stated that the photogrammetric method using a UAV meets the accuracy requirements laid down for the most stringent International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) order, i.e., Exclusive Order (Total Horizontal Uncertainty (THU) of 5 m with a confidence level of 95%), which they relate to coastline measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep learning-based object detection in low-altitude UAV datasets: A survey
    Mittal, Payal
    Singh, Raman
    Sharma, Akashdeep
    IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 2020, 104 (104)
  • [32] Low-altitude Fixed-wing UAV Obstacle Recognition Based on Deep Learning
    Ding, Dian
    Wang, Yangzhu
    Xiao, Yao
    Han, Zhen
    2018 IEEE CSAA GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION AND CONTROL CONFERENCE (CGNCC), 2018,
  • [33] Target Detection of Low-Altitude UAV Based on Improved YOLOv3 Network
    Zhai, Haiqing
    Zhang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2022, 2022
  • [34] Spectral Band Design for Urban Forest Remote Sensing Based on Low-Altitude UAV
    Wang, Honghao
    Liu, Chun
    Zhou, Xiaoteng
    Li, Yanyi
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 17 : 2308 - 2318
  • [35] Low-Altitude UAV Detection Based on Vehicle-Mounted Wideband Programmable Metasurface
    Xu, Hantao
    Guan, Dongfang
    Li, Zhi
    Xu, Kai-Da
    Liu, Zhen
    Liu, Yongxiang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, 2024, 72 (12) : 7018 - 7027
  • [36] Vision-Based UAV Self-Positioning in Low-Altitude Urban Environments
    Dai, Ming
    Zheng, Enhui
    Feng, Zhenhua
    Qi, Lei
    Zhuang, Jiedong
    Yang, Wankou
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2024, 33 : 493 - 508
  • [37] The Advantage by Using Low-Altitude UAV for Sustainable Urban Development Control
    Djimantoro, Michael I.
    Suhardjanto, Gatot
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECO ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT 2017 (ICEED 2017), 2018, 109
  • [38] Low-Altitude Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing in UAV for Improving Mapping Accuracy
    Ma, Shuying
    Zhang, Kai
    MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [39] Low-Altitude Target Detection Method Based on Distributed Sensor Networks
    Du, Xin
    Shang, Huatao
    Wang, Lei
    Sun, Yingfei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 56458 - 56468
  • [40] A method for determination of the coordinates of a low-altitude target
    Balagurovskii, V. A.
    Kondratiev, A. S.
    Polishchuk, N. P.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS, 2012, 57 (10) : 1107 - 1121