Method for Determining Coastline Course Based on Low-Altitude Images Taken by a UAV

被引:2
|
作者
Marchel, Lukasz [1 ]
Specht, Mariusz [2 ]
机构
[1] Polish Naval Acad, Dept Nav & Hydrog, Smidowicza 69, PL-81127 Gdynia, Poland
[2] Gdynia Maritime Univ, Dept Transport & Logist, Morska 81-87, PL-81225 Gdynia, Poland
关键词
coastline; shoreline; Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); satellite imagery; Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); Real Time Kinematic (RTK); SHORELINE; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/rs15194700
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the most popular methods for determining coastline course are geodetic, satellite, and tacheometric techniques. None of the above-mentioned measurement methods allows marking out the shoreline both in an accurate way and with high coverage of the terrain with surveys. For this reason, intensive works are currently underway to find alternative solutions that could accurately, extensively, and quickly determine coastline course. Based on a review of the literature regarding shoreline measurements, it can be concluded that the photogrammetric method, based on low-altitude images taken by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), has the greatest potential. The aim of this publication is to present and validate a method for determining coastline course based on low-altitude photos taken by a drone. Shoreline measurements were carried out using the DJI Matrice 300 RTK UAV in the coastal zone at the public beach in Gdynia (Poland) in 2023. In addition, the coastline course was marked out using high-resolution satellite imagery (0.3-0.5 m). In order to calculate the accuracy of determining the shoreline by photogrammetric and satellite methods, it was decided to relate them to the coastline marked out using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) receiver with an accuracy of 2.4 cm Distance Root Mean Square (DRMS). Studies have shown that accuracies of determining coastline course using a UAV are 0.47 m (p = 0.95) for the orthophotomosaic method and 0.70 m (p = 0.95) for the Digital Surface Model (DSM), and are much more accurate than the satellite method, which amounted to 6.37 m (p = 0.95) for the Pleiades Neo satellite and 9.24 m (p = 0.95) for the Hexagon Europe satellite. Based on the obtained test results, it can be stated that the photogrammetric method using a UAV meets the accuracy requirements laid down for the most stringent International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) order, i.e., Exclusive Order (Total Horizontal Uncertainty (THU) of 5 m with a confidence level of 95%), which they relate to coastline measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Color-based watershed segmentation of low-altitude aerial images
    Huguet, AB
    de Andrade, MC
    Carceroni, RL
    Araújo, AD
    XVII BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 138 - 145
  • [22] Detecting Wheat Heads from UAV Low-Altitude Remote Sensing Images Using Deep Learning Based on Transformer
    Zhu, Jiangpeng
    Yang, Guofeng
    Feng, Xuping
    Li, Xiyao
    Fang, Hui
    Zhang, Jinnuo
    Bai, Xiulin
    Tao, Mingzhu
    He, Yong
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [23] A Multilayer Low-Altitude Airspace Model for UAV Traffic Management
    Labib, Nader S.
    Danoy, Gregoire
    Musial, Jedrzej
    Brust, Matthias R.
    Bouvry, Pascal
    DIVANET'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH ACM SYMPOSIUM ON DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF INTELLIGENT VEHICULAR NETWORKS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, : 57 - 63
  • [24] Military Image Captioning for Low-Altitude UAV or UGV Perspectives
    Pan, Lizhi
    Song, Chengtian
    Gan, Xiaozheng
    Xu, Keyu
    Xie, Yue
    DRONES, 2024, 8 (09)
  • [25] UAV Low-Altitude Remote Sensing for Precision Weed Management
    Huang, Yanbo
    Reddy, Krishna N.
    Fletcher, Reginald S.
    Pennington, Dean
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [26] Empirical Dynamic Modeling for Low-Altitude UAV Propagation Channels
    Huang, Zeyu
    Rodriguez-Pineiro, Jose
    Dominguez-Bolano, Tomas
    Cai, Xuesong
    Yin, Xuefeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 20 (08) : 5171 - 5185
  • [27] Risk assessment framework for low-altitude UAV traffic management
    Zhang Honghong
    Gan Xusheng
    Liu Ying
    Wu Yarong
    Sun Jingjuan
    Tong Liang
    Yang Feng
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 42 (03) : 2775 - 2792
  • [28] Discriminative features enhancement for low-altitude UAV object detection
    Huang, Shuqin
    Ren, Shasha
    Wu, Wei
    Liu, Qiong
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2024, 147
  • [29] Coverage Analysis for Low-Altitude UAV Networks in Urban Environments
    Galkin, Boris
    Kibilda, Jacek
    DaSilva, Luiz A.
    GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, 2017,
  • [30] Views on the study of low-altitude airspace resources for UAV applications
    Liao, Xiaohan
    Huang, Yaohuan
    Xu, Chenchen
    Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76 (11): : 2607 - 2620