Method for Determining Coastline Course Based on Low-Altitude Images Taken by a UAV

被引:2
|
作者
Marchel, Lukasz [1 ]
Specht, Mariusz [2 ]
机构
[1] Polish Naval Acad, Dept Nav & Hydrog, Smidowicza 69, PL-81127 Gdynia, Poland
[2] Gdynia Maritime Univ, Dept Transport & Logist, Morska 81-87, PL-81225 Gdynia, Poland
关键词
coastline; shoreline; Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); satellite imagery; Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); Real Time Kinematic (RTK); SHORELINE; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/rs15194700
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the most popular methods for determining coastline course are geodetic, satellite, and tacheometric techniques. None of the above-mentioned measurement methods allows marking out the shoreline both in an accurate way and with high coverage of the terrain with surveys. For this reason, intensive works are currently underway to find alternative solutions that could accurately, extensively, and quickly determine coastline course. Based on a review of the literature regarding shoreline measurements, it can be concluded that the photogrammetric method, based on low-altitude images taken by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), has the greatest potential. The aim of this publication is to present and validate a method for determining coastline course based on low-altitude photos taken by a drone. Shoreline measurements were carried out using the DJI Matrice 300 RTK UAV in the coastal zone at the public beach in Gdynia (Poland) in 2023. In addition, the coastline course was marked out using high-resolution satellite imagery (0.3-0.5 m). In order to calculate the accuracy of determining the shoreline by photogrammetric and satellite methods, it was decided to relate them to the coastline marked out using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) receiver with an accuracy of 2.4 cm Distance Root Mean Square (DRMS). Studies have shown that accuracies of determining coastline course using a UAV are 0.47 m (p = 0.95) for the orthophotomosaic method and 0.70 m (p = 0.95) for the Digital Surface Model (DSM), and are much more accurate than the satellite method, which amounted to 6.37 m (p = 0.95) for the Pleiades Neo satellite and 9.24 m (p = 0.95) for the Hexagon Europe satellite. Based on the obtained test results, it can be stated that the photogrammetric method using a UAV meets the accuracy requirements laid down for the most stringent International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) order, i.e., Exclusive Order (Total Horizontal Uncertainty (THU) of 5 m with a confidence level of 95%), which they relate to coastline measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Robust Photogrammetric Processing Method of Low-Altitude UAV Images
    Ai, Mingyao
    Hu, Qingwu
    Li, Jiayuan
    Wang, Ming
    Yuan, Hui
    Wang, Shaohua
    REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (03) : 2302 - 2333
  • [2] Low-altitude UAV detection method based on optimized CenterNet
    Zhang R.
    Li N.
    Zhang X.
    Zhou H.
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, 48 (11): : 2335 - 2344
  • [3] Gobi Vegetation Recognition Based on Low-Altitude Photogrammetry Images of UAV<bold> </bold>
    YangDemeng
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF GREEN BUILDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (GBEM 2018), 2018, 186
  • [4] ERNet: A Rapid Road Crack Detection Method Using Low-Altitude UAV Remote Sensing Images
    Duan, Zexian
    Liu, Jiahang
    Ling, Xinpeng
    Zhang, Jinlong
    Liu, Zhiheng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [5] Low-Altitude UAV Detection and Recognition Method Based on Optimized YOLOv3
    Ma Qi
    Zhu Bin
    Zhang Hongwei
    Zhang Yang
    Jiang Yuchen
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2019, 56 (20)
  • [6] A Feature Pyramid Based Multi-stage Framework for Object Detection in Low-altitude UAV Images
    Mittal, Payal
    Sharma, Akashdeep
    Singh, Raman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2022, 31 (02)
  • [7] LOW-ALTITUDE TARGET DETECTION BY COASTLINE OPERATED MARINE RADAR
    NEELAKANTA, PS
    DEGROFF, D
    SUDHAKAR, R
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1992, 28 (01) : 217 - 223
  • [8] UAV Localization in Low-Altitude GNSS-Denied Environments Based on POI and Store Signage Text Matching in UAV Images
    Liu, Yu
    Bai, Jing
    Wang, Gang
    Wu, Xiaobo
    Sun, Fangde
    Guo, Zhengqiang
    Geng, Hujun
    DRONES, 2023, 7 (07)
  • [9] Calibration Site BRDF Modeling Method Based on Ground and Low-Altitude UAV Joint Observation
    He Yuqing
    Hu Wenjie
    Hu Xiuqing
    Zhu Jibiao
    He Xingwei
    Jin Weiqi
    ACTA OPTICA SINICA, 2023, 43 (15)
  • [10] Rapid crops classification based on UAV low-altitude remote sensing
    Tian, Zhenkun
    Fu, Yingying
    Liu, Suhong
    Liu, Feng
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29 (07): : 109 - 116