Osteomyelitis of the Lower Limb: Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT versus MRI

被引:13
|
作者
Foti, Giovanni [1 ]
Longo, Chiara [1 ]
Sorgato, Claudia [2 ]
Oliboni, Eugenio Simone [1 ]
Mazzi, Cristina [3 ]
Motta, Leonardo [4 ]
Bertoli, Giulia [4 ]
Marocco, Stefania [4 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Radiol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[2] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Diabetol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[3] IRCCS Osped Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Clin Res Unit, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
[4] IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hosp, Dept Infect Trop Dis & Microbiol, I-37042 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy
关键词
chronic pain; osteomyelitis; MRI; dual-energy CT; bone marrow edema; BONE-MARROW EDEMA; IMAGING TESTS; FOOT; IDENTIFICATION; PITFALLS; UTILITY;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13040703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: MRI is the preferred imaging technique for the identification of osteomyelitis. The key element for diagnosis is the presence of bone marrow edema (BME). Dual-energy CT (DECT) is an alternative tool which is able to identify BME in the lower limb. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of DECT and MRI for osteomyelitis, using clinical, microbiological, and imaging data as reference standards. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center study enrolled consecutive patients with suspected bone infections undergoing DECT and MRI imaging from December 2020 to June 2022. Four blinded radiologists with various experience levels (range of 3-21 years) evaluated the imaging findings. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in the presence of BMEs, abscesses, sinus tracts, bone reabsorption, or gaseous elements. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of each method were determined and compared using a multi-reader multi-case analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In total, 44 study participants (mean age 62.5 years +/- 16.5 [SD], 32 men) were evaluated. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in 32 participants. For the MRI, the mean sensitivity and specificity were 89.1% and 87.5%, while for the DECT they were 89.0% and 72.9%, respectively. The DECT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.88), compared with the MRI (AUC = 0.92) (p = 0.12). When considering each imaging finding alone, the best accuracy was achieved by considering BME (AUC for DECT 0.85 versus AUC of MRI of 0.93, with p = 0.07), followed by the presence of bone erosions (AUC 0.77 for DECT and 0.53 for MRI, with p = 0.02). The inter-reader agreement of the DECT (k = 88) was similar to that of the MRI (k = 90). Conclusion: Dual-energy CT demonstrated a good diagnostic performance in detecting osteomyelitis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy of liver metastasis detection and characterization: Dual-energy CT versus single-energy CT with deep learning reconstruction
    Jensen, Corey T.
    Wong, Vincenzo K.
    Wagner-Bartak, Nicolaus A.
    Liu, Xinming
    Sobha, Renjith Padmanabhan Nair
    Sun, Jia
    Likhari, Gauruv S.
    Gupta, Shiva
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 168
  • [32] Evaluation of Proton Dose Accuracy Improvements with Dual-Energy CT
    Mossahebi, S.
    Sabouri, P.
    Ranjbar, M.
    Strauss, J.
    O'Neil, M.
    Polf, J. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S77 - S77
  • [33] Dual-energy CT versus Ultrasound, Alone or in Combination, for the Diagnosis of Gout: A Diagnostic Performance Study
    Singh, Jasvinder
    Becce, Fabio
    Budzik, Jean-Francois
    Pascart, Tristan
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 72
  • [34] Focused Dual-energy CT Maintains Diagnostic and Compositional Accuracy for Urolithiasis Using Ultralow-dose Noncontrast CT
    Wilhelm, Konrad
    Schoenthaler, Martin
    Hein, Simon
    Adams, Fabian
    Schlager, Daniel
    Kuehhas, Franklin Emmanuel
    Sevcenco, Sabina
    Pache, Gregor
    Langer, Mathias
    Bulla, Stefan
    Miernik, Arkadiusz
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (06) : 1097 - 1102
  • [35] Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT in nonspecific terminal ileitis
    Xu, Xingyuan
    Zhu, Junting
    Wang, Xia
    Zhu, Chao
    Wu, Xingwang
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 40 (10) : 1069 - 1078
  • [36] Dual-Energy CT Imaging in Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Therapy
    Molloi, S.
    Li, B.
    Yin, F.
    Chen, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 486 - 487
  • [37] Dual-Energy CT: Lower Limits of Iodine Detection and Quantification
    Jacobsen, Megan C.
    Cressman, Erik N. K.
    Tamm, Eric P.
    Baluya, Dodge L.
    Duan, Xinhui
    Cody, Dianna D.
    Schellingerhout, Dawid
    Layman, Rick R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) : 414 - 419
  • [38] Dual-energy CT of the bone marrow in multiple myeloma: diagnostic accuracy for quantitative differentiation of infiltration patterns
    Kosmala, Aleksander
    Weng, Andreas Max
    Krauss, Bernhard
    Knop, Stefan
    Bley, Thorsten Alexander
    Petritsch, Bernhard
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (12) : 5083 - 5090
  • [39] Dual-energy CT of the bone marrow in multiple myeloma: diagnostic accuracy for quantitative differentiation of infiltration patterns
    Aleksander Kosmala
    Andreas Max Weng
    Bernhard Krauss
    Stefan Knop
    Thorsten Alexander Bley
    Bernhard Petritsch
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 5083 - 5090
  • [40] Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT-Derived Metrics for the Prediction of Osteoporosis-Associated Fractures
    Reschke, Philipp
    Koch, Vitali
    Mahmoudi, Scherwin
    Gotta, Jennifer
    Hoehne, Elena
    Booz, Christian
    Yel, Ibrahim
    Scholtz, Jan-Erik
    Martin, Simon S.
    Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana
    Eichler, Katrin
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Gruenewald, Leon D.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (12) : 5108 - 5117